Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HC Candidate List


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know people didn't want us to interview him, but Dan Quinn knows how to call a defense.

It is the same thing as Sean Payton, Mr. Scot. Ex rivalries are hard to let go. I have no doubt that both Quinn and Payton would have this team competing much faster than any rookie HC.

Edited by philit99
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's too big a job for one man. That's why there are so few of them anymore.

Hell, we just spent three years under a full control coach.

I get it, difference is, Rhule is a crap coach Payton is not. Not saying I’m advocating for Payton, but comparing this to Rhule seems odd to me. Payton has at least shown he can do it, heck, why not let him have it. It’s gotta be better that what we’ve seen for quite some time. Even going back to the Hurney days. Have we ever really had a good GM? Have we ever really had a coach of Payton’s caliber? 
 

On the flip side, if he messes up we are screwed. Gets to big headed…we are screwed. Anyway, thanks for your input, I’ve seen a lot of users say they don’t want a coach with full control but never say why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I get it, difference is, Rhule is a crap coach Payton is not. Not saying I’m advocating for Payton, but comparing this to Rhule seems odd to me. Payton has at least shown he can do it, heck, why not let him have it. It’s gotta be better that what we’ve seen for quite some time. Even going back to the Hurney days. Have we ever really had a good GM? Have we ever really had a coach of Payton’s caliber? 

On the flip side, if he messes up we are screwed. Gets to big headed…we are screwed. Anyway, thanks for your input, I’ve seen a lot of users say they don’t want a coach with full control but never say why. 

I've hated that model since long before Rhule, honestly. Any one guy going unchecked can go really wrong, really fast.

Tepper has stated after the Rhule experience,  he wouldn't have a full control head coach again. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Is he still scheduled to sit with us tomorrow? I want to see what the real demands are and not all of these reports. 

That kind of information almost never becomes public. We didn't even know the true dynamic between Fitts and Rhule for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...