Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

coach/qb/#9/FA


ericr0319
 Share

Recommended Posts

What is YOUR ideal scenario for this offseason, but within reason?

Pick your HC;

Who do you want to START at QB week 1;

Who do you WANT us to draft, within reason at 9 (we are not getting Will Anderson or Jalen Carter);

and 1 FA you think we have a REASONABLE chance at.

HC - I was leaning Ben Johnson, but now I am thinking about Mike Kafka - Andy Reid tree and look what he has done with the Giants. 2 games away from the Super Bowl.

QB - Darnold. Sam earned himself a reasonable 2 year contract without a lot of guaranteed the 2nd year. He was good for us and at times great. He was never a BAD QB for us this year. 

Draft - This one is tough, because its early and without the benefits of the combine and free agency who knows what will happen. Honestly too, its not a GREAT draft class IMO. Right now, if we were at 9 - ideally trade back if a QB slips and we aren't in the market for one (because our new HC likes what he has). But I guess Bryan Breese or QJ, but I'd lean QJ (see below at DT).

Free Agency -  Resign Darnold, Bozeman, and Foreman and you can do so by cutting Shaq, Elfien, Ian Thomas (not a big save but just get him off the team, hes taking away a spot for a guy that might actually make a difference--unless, and correct me if I am wrong, but is he an elite blocker?), Haynes, D. Wilson. But a guy from another team, if he is available would be Da'Ron Payne, idk if we can make it affordable. But man would we have two great DT to pair with Burns and make his job easier. 

a freebie that I wanted to add - two underrated WR to maybe take a look at are DJ Chark and Marvin Jones. and pair our two 2nds to trade back up late in the first if someone is falling, maybe a Michael Mayer. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben Johnson

Darnold to start, rookie QB in after the bye week (or earlier if we get a late bye week)

Trade up for Stroud.  If a trade up is unreasonable or undoable, I’d be fine with Levis, Richardson or Quentin Johnston or a good DE (haven’t researched them yet).

Bozeman is a must, Foreman would be great, if Chark is a FA he’d be great. I’ve liked him since that year’s draft season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Ben Johnson

Darnold to start, rookie QB in after the bye week (or earlier if we get a late bye week)

Trade up for Stroud.  If a trade up is unreasonable or undoable, I’d be fine with Levis, Richardson or Quentin Johnston or a good DE (haven’t researched them yet).

Bozeman is a must, Foreman would be great, if Chark is a FA he’d be great. I’ve liked him since that year’s draft season. 

I agree with most of this but signing a FA WR. They are just too expensive these days... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

HC: Steichen or Johnson. I lean toward Steichen because...

QB/#9: Anthony Richardson. He has the most physical talent and upside in the draft. Pair him with a HC who has already turned a raw physical talent into an MVP caliber QB. Re-sign Darnold to good backup money as a bridge/mentor.

same here. would be good with Kafka as well. Richardson is a 'swing for the fences' type pick, which is exactly what you need and paring him with Steichen seems like the best thing to do since he seemed to do well with Hurts. I'd be really good with Johnson or Kafka, but I think if we need to really develop a QB then Steichen is the man. Though I think that Kafka might be good doing that as well.

Steichen I think would do a really good job, probably better than the other choices, at adapting everything to what Richardson does well. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Ben Johnson

Darnold to start, rookie QB in after the bye week (or earlier if we get a late bye week)

Trade up for Stroud.  If a trade up is unreasonable or undoable, I’d be fine with Levis, Richardson or Quentin Johnston or a good DE (haven’t researched them yet).

Bozeman is a must, Foreman would be great, if Chark is a FA he’d be great. I’ve liked him since that year’s draft season. 

If Sam has a 2.5 to 1 td int ratio and 250yds per game the rookie should never see the field.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HC: Steichen or Johnson - Happy with either

QB Room: CJ Stroud, Cooper Rush, Matt Corral - It's possible the new HC doesn't want Darnold.  Is he really worth a $5 mil backup contract?  If we don't land a top-3 QB, this gets really interesting for a new coach.  Do you gamble w/Richardson? The FA crop is bad, Darnold is a .500 guy at best, and the remaining draft is sparse.  

Draft: I'd love to land a WR, TE, & RB a piece.  Favorites:

WR: Zay Flowers, Rashee Rice, Josh Downs

TE: Luke Musgrave, Dalton Kincaid, Luke Schoonmaker

RB: Zach Charbonnet, Chase Brown, Tijae Spears

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HC - as much as I like the idea of Sean Payton he is just too expensive for a franchise like us right now.  We can't afford the pick(s) we would lose.  One of these top OC's I could see or even Wilks I am good.  I am not as confident in any of them particularly

QB - 100% NO to Anthony Richardson - I truly don't get the hype at all.  I understand the potential but he has shown nothing but flashes, was bad against good teams, and has only 1 year as a starter.  Even if he is good it will be a few years away and we don't have anyone to teach him.  Yes I've seen highlights and games...bottom line he is currently an inaccurate, running QB - that doesn't win Superbowls - maybe some day but not now and never has.  Darnold absolutely HAS NOT earned a 2-yr starter contract.  Not sure how you could watch that NO game and say he hasn't been bad this year.  He managed games - that is all.  I am good with signing his as a backup only for a much lower contract.  The guy finsihed the season with a Comp % well below 60% and INT % above 2.0.  His 5th year in the league he is no better than his rookie year.

QB again - my reasonable dream would be to sign Derek Carr after he is cut.  He is still a very good QB, very good leader, and should be a very good mentor to a young QB like Corral or anyone else we draft later.  As long as his contract reflects a guy who got cut and is 32-yr old this year we could afford it.

Draft - there is no way we can afford the trade up for Stroud or Young - young QB are never guaranteed and we are multiple players away from a SB without enough FA to fill traded picks.  I have no confidence in the next 2 QB's as worth #9 so I would go Quinton Johnston or Jordan Addison or a top LB or EDGE depending on what is there. I would take Meyer (if he dropped ALOT) or a top TE or EDGE with the 2nd pick - or a good CB if possible there.

FA - Bozeman I agree is a must and I would love to resign Foreman - now that is a guy who earned a contract.  But we desperately need a MLB and CB's.  Hopefully we find some solid upgrades accross some other areas too

Marvin Jones?  33-yr old.....wasn't very good with Trevor?  HECK NO.  And Chark is just OK....more of a 3rd WR IMO and not much of an upgrade over TMJ.  And also they are expensive - we need money elsewhere badly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. HC: Steichen, Johnson, or Kafka

2. QB: don't really care; just don't give up draft capital and reach for a quick fix; we have no quick fix. Get a free agent for cheap and start getting Corral and whomever we draft reps.

3. Draft: take Young, Stroud, or Levis if they drop. If not, trade back. If no trade back is worth it take the best at position of need for wr, lb, edge.

4. FA: Lavonte David lb, David Long lb, Jakobi Meyers wr. One of these three would eliminate a draft need.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I would not complain one bit and have no stakes in NC college ball.  Let's do it 

He is gonna be a superstar. All the tools. Honestly though I hope we don’t draft him because it’s gonna suck to watch him be misused here and waste his talents on this crap team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...