Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible London game next year at Titans


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, t96 said:

They have 9 home games so there’s a 1 in 9 chance and we were just there not that long ago. I doubt we play in London next year

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

F U London if this happens.  We've been planning for 4 years now a vacation to Nashville and were planning it for this next year so we could catch the Panthers away game there.  I will be beyond pissed.  These extra 17th games need to be the ones chosen for this nonsense so fans can make plans according to the regular schedule rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panfanman said:

F U London if this happens.  We've been planning for 4 years now a vacation to Nashville and were planning it for this next year so we could catch the Panthers away game there.  I will be beyond pissed.  These extra 17th games need to be the ones chosen for this nonsense so fans can make plans according to the regular schedule rotation.

Bruh I've been going to shitty Titan games after the panthers have been eliminated just so I can score some free tixs from my fiancés dad this year. I'm crushed if this happens.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Titans just announced they are going to London next year for one of their home games, one of our games is in Tennessee next year. Would suck to have such a close away game moved but dem the apples.

It'll probably be against the Jags...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Ok so my math was way off, its 2/15 opponents not 2/8. I eliminated the Jags and Titans away games against each other as possibilities as well as the jags hosting the Chiefs since the Chiefs play in Germany. The final chances are 13.33% we are selected for one of the games. Now... if the NFL decides it has to be an AFC vs NFC game the chances obviously skyrocket but for right now its 13.33%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, joemac said:

Only if you're flying Frontier or Spirit, which are like cattle cars in the air.  All the better airlines are incredibly expensive.  

We just got back.  A few weeks ago.  Flew Southwest nonstop out of Atlanta.  Very reasonable.  I will say this though, we were very lucky.  60% of the flights were cancelled on our way back.  The terminal was a ghost town.  Half the restaurants in the airport closed because of lack of flyers.  Ours wasn't cancelled.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Ok so my math was way off, its 2/15 opponents not 2/8. I eliminated the Jags and Titans away games against each other as possibilities as well as the jags hosting the Chiefs since the Chiefs play in Germany. The final chances are 13.33% we are selected for one of the games. Now... if the NFL decides it has to be an AFC vs NFC game the chances obviously skyrocket but for right now its 13.33%

Ok even more terrible news...

if the NFL is in fact teeing this up for an NFC opponent for each of the AFC clubs our chances skyrocket insanely to 40%... the Falcons can't be held to double jeopardy as if they are selected for one... they can't be selected for the other so that adds even more fuel to the fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Roaring Riot already has cabanas for the Jags game so that’ll be in Jacksonville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...