Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playoffs - Week Two


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I would be shocked if the NFL doesn't let Mahommes  vs Allen part 2 happen.

 

It's already suspicious that game is at a neutral site despite KC having a better record. The NFL just makes up rules as they go.

Had Buffalo won out in the regular season, they would have hosted. There really was no way the NFL could win with any decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Off topic but did anyone see First Take and they asked what team should Brady sign with and everyone said the Raiders. Dan Orlovsky was the only one who said Carolina.

 

They all laughed at Carolina being a option. Just shows you those clowns only care about sexy markets. They said Brady would disappear in Carolina.

They’re not wrong

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Had Buffalo won out in the regular season, they would have hosted. There really was no way the NFL could win with any decision.

Agreed.  Short of actually playing the Buffalo-Cincy game and shoving everything but the Superb Owl out a week to make up the odd week, a neutral site if it was KC vs. Buffalo or even Buffalo vs. Cincy was the only thing that made sense.  As it is, KC got the benefit of the round 1 bye.

Edited by Sgt Schultz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...