Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Reich's Intro Presser - Today, Noon EST


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

I want to hear specifics but we’ll probably get a bunch of BS like ‘we’ll be the most prepared, most physical team’ blah blah.

Understood. To be fair though, it's only his second day on the job. What specifics are there that he can divulge?

He's talked already about the kind of offense he prefers and such. You'll likely get some more of that, but as far as details on players or coaches they might target, a lot of that stuff is fluid at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The DJ they used to use for my high school dances always liked to play "Hair of the Dog".

Going from Christian music pregame to "Hair of the Dog" after is... interesting 😆

(granted, The band does have a biblical name)

Now you’re messing with a son of b!tch.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Understood. To be fair though, it's only his second day on the job. What specifics are there that he can divulge?

He's talked already about the kind of offense he prefers and such. You'll likely get some more of that, but as far as details on players or coaches they might target, a lot of that stuff is fluid at this point.

At a minimum, this type of thing is just good to gauge the general feel and direction of things.  

I imagine we'll get more into his vision, some big picture stuff beyond that short interview he had.  Expect to hear a lot of generalities and to players we already have, but I'm excited to see what other takeaways come from it.  If he came to his interview as prepared as it sounded, he could have a pretty strong plan in place.  Would love to hear what he sold to Tepper and what we should expect.    

Also--He's quite a different dude than Ron & Matt so it's going to be a different feel than we're used to from the HC.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Am oddly anticipating.  I think they may have actually gotten it right?  God I hope we got it right.

It will definitely feel like he's more in control of the moment and not this awe struck youngling or out of element college guy.  I think we'll definitely sense why Tepper/Fitt/Dan went in this direction in thinking about it in that regard.  He garners respect, people like playing for him and coaching with him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...