Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even if we trade up to #1....


tarheelfan23
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not a Colin Cowherd fan but I caught the end of his show and he said that he has a inside source within the Bears front office and he said they are definitely going to try and trade Justin Fields.

 

Give me Fields all day over Richardson or Levis.

hell no...give me AR over fields

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Hurts is a running QB. Mahomes is a mobile QB. 

Mahomes is not a running QB - he is a mobile QB.  That is a pass-first QB who runs at times when he scrambles and occasional designed runs.  They have roll out plays as a standard of their game.  Russell Wilson, younger Rogers, Mahomes, Trevor

A running QB runs as a primary function of his game - RPO, designed runs.  Cam Newton, Lamar, Vick, RGIII

Hurts MAY have success long term as a running QB, but so far he has 2 seasons....longevity and consistency is always the issue.  If he loses the SB he would be 2-2....don't crown him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, tarheelfan23 said:

AR will be better than both of those

please provide a detailed explination an analysis as to why you believe AR will be better than those two.

or are you just rolling with "he's dat dude bruh, look at him run. youtube highlights be lit".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...