Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest info on staff building


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, B_Eazi said:

So let me get this straight. They didn’t feel comfortable offering Wilks a position because they interviewed him for a head coaching position yet were interviewing Evero after interviewing him for HC position. I totally gets Wilks stance to move on but from a Panthers perspective that can’t look to good for his lawsuit 

It’s not because he was interviewing for HC, it’s because he actually was briefly the HC. You can’t have the guy the team was previously taking orders from drop down the chain of command.  It causes potential conflict. This does absolutely nothing for any possible claim of wrongdoing. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Update: Mike Kaye makes it sound like a genuine possibility

Maybe that initial interview went better than we know 

One thing to keep in mind is that the Vikings defense is old.  Kendricks is 30, Hicks is 30, Peterson is 32, Smith is 30, H. Smith is 33.  Even Hunter is already 28.  Not an ideal spot for a DC.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

More from an old friend of ours...

 

I’d think any team looking for a DC would be interested in this guy. I don’t see Morris getting the Indy job though. Something tells me it’s Saturday or Steichen. Of course, who really knows what Irsay will do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Reich seems to inspire an insane amount of loyalty. Sirianni went off on one with the media when the Eagles beat the Colts this year. 

Reggie Wayne would be a great addition to the offensive staff if true. We could use an upgrade here as our WR coaching has been a bit underwhelming for some time now. We’ll see if there’s any interest there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

More from an old friend of ours...

 

“which is not how it was deployed last year due to a variety of factors inclusive to personnel, an offense that couldn’t score”

 

I’ve wondered about this.  We’ve heard how this should be an attractive job due to the defensive pieces.

But how much has the other side of the ball is effecting it.  I know we hired a experienced offensive coach.  But we still have the by far worst QB room in the entire NFL.  Does a defensive guy want to come in with all the pressure of having to carry the entire team due to the dead weight of the offense?

We saw Fangio go to a team with one of the most high powered offenses in the NFL, and we later heard money wasn’t the main factor.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...