Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest info on staff building


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

If, as everybody suspects will happen, Evero gets a head coaching job next season, Bradley could conceivably be back in play (depending on what happens in Indy).

If Evero is true to the direction he was given his replacement will already be on the team. Remember, one of his directives was to hire and train his successor as part of his staff. I think Reich and the soon to be OC will be given the same orders. I like the concept of doing that, as they should.  How practical it will be is yet to be determined. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If Evero is true to the direction he was given his replacement will already be on the team. Remember, one of his directives was to hire and train his successor as part of his staff. I think Reich and the soon to be OC will be given the same orders. I like the concept of doing that, as they should.  How practical it will be is yet to be determined. 

Unless you already have somebody that's been at least somewhat groomed for that role, that's a pretty difficult thing to do in one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GOAT said:

someone make sure to tell Wilkes that when he's in charge of defense this time around to make sure his safety is helping over the top on a back up CB vs a HOF QB and his only WR target. 

specially when playoffs are on the line.

The fact that he called it like that with his career on the line is the reason I jumped off the Wilks train.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...