Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody still not on board?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm curious who people's first choice was 🤔

Honestly, I didn't have one at first.  As it went on I thought Reich was probably the best of the bunch from an experience perspective. But I didn't sit in on the interviews with the other's so I was open there for awhile.  I'm comfortable with how it played out so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Wouldn’t that be 1.5% Khalifa. Or 1.25? 

Yea, Khalifa was my darkhorse, I could agree with that. Along with lowering one of the others not named johnson. My eyes and mind wanted a young HC and had old man river as the backup plan.....No issue with the outcome given I didnt sit in on interviews. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

 

Yea, Khalifa was my darkhorse, I could agree with that. Along with lowering one of the others not named johnson. My eyes and mind wanted a young HC and had old man river as the backup plan.....No issue with the outcome given I didnt sit in on interviews. 

I don’t think you got my joke? I know you meant Kafka. But when I saw Khalifa, Wiz and rolling papers came to mind19BC1D07-943B-4C0A-8FAC-D6E952FBAF69.thumb.png.e3a021c9e71ff479f59fc2ff1e320ddc.png

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted Payton mainly for the credibility he would have brought, a superbowl winner who turned the ain'ts from bottom feeders to regular playoff contenders , say what you will about bountygate 

But we would have had to sell our soul to New Orleans , and Payton would have nothing to work with , so it worked out for the best 

I get alot more hope from Reich and his staff than I have from any of our coaches in a long time

So yes I am 100% on board 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I preferred your way. Made me think of “back in the day”

Like that tune. Plus I think I still have my first package of zig zags I bought many many moons ago.....the rough crew I came up with were alll about teh blunts.......and i maybe the first human who quit after visiting colorado. it was a big deal to me seeing friends and others, wake up and immediately grab their dap stuff.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...