Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

What do you want Panthers to do this offseason?  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you want Panthers to do regarding QB situation this offseason

    • Draft best available QB at current draft position (#9)
      59
    • Trade up with Bears (#1) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
      47
    • Trade up with Cardinals (#3) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
      58
    • Sign Derek Carr and draft best available player at #9
      51
    • Trade for Lamar Jackson, fully guaranteed contract (Watson like trade)
      2

Recommended Posts

NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted (edited)

I would like to gauge where we stand as a fanbase on this topic.  A lot of people seem to be warming up to idea of signing another free agent instead of drafting a potential franchise QB. What say you? 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kentucky Panther Mentor

Kentucky Panther

Posted
Posted (edited)

My choices in order:

 

Trade up to 3, grab the QB they like the best out of who’s available. 
 

Trade up to 1, go ahead and give up the farm and get exactly who they want. 
 

Sign Carr, draft BPA at 9. 
 

I don’t want us to sit at 9 and take the leftovers from the QB spot. Last option for me. 

Edited by Kentucky Panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted (edited)
  • Sign Darnold to two year, 5 mil per year deal if he'll accept.
  • Wait until draft night for any trade up since a team like the Colts could jump us if we move to 3 too early.
  • If the right guy (Young or Stroud) is there at pick #3, make the call.
  • If Young & Stroud are both gone by pick #3, trade down and select BPA.
  • Draft Hooker with our 3rd or 4A pick.
  • Play Darnold the first 5 games. If we're 3-2 or better, keep rolling until we're out of playoff contention. If we're 2-3 or worse, insert Hooker/Corral to see what they have. If they don't have it, it doesn't matter and stick with them putting us in good position to grab a QB in the 2024 draft.

 

Edited by ECHornet
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monty83 Contributor

Monty83

Posted
Posted

I hate Matt Rhule and his selection so much right now. Because we feel the need to rush this process now. We have zero patience. We have the staff we should’ve had before. Either go all-in and trade up for YOUR guy or trade out of 9 and do the same thing next year with two first rounders. DO NOT get a guy just because he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • t96
      D-Mo on FA & some of my general thoughts

      By t96 · Posted

      My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • MrBubba
      BREAKING: Panthers have interest in Deebo Samuel

      By MrBubba · Posted

    • h0llywood
      BREAKING: Panthers have interest in Deebo Samuel

      By h0llywood · Posted

      His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...