Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears have been approached by multiple teams for #1 Pick and are leaning towards trading the pick away per Adam Schefter

Varking

By Varking,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

In the sense that the demands could not be reached. 

No chance ATL was trading the vick pick. Plus just like the others, vick checked all the boxes, his arm strength was legendary. About the one issue, he was a lefty with accuracy questions. 

College wise, hard as it is to make this work. For sure Id taken vick over manning. A tyreek hill that has a 155, gimmie that.....

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Yes!! I don’t understand why ppl are trying to put Vick on this list because he was seen the same way Cam was.. 

? on accuracy 

? on football intelligence 

? on work ethic

? on if his style of play could work in the NFL..

Nooo Vick was not looked at like Elway, Lawrence or Luck..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Maybe my isnt, cause I dont recall that. I do remember SD had terrible ownership and rep, that many avoided ala eli deal as well. Was there any "I aint playin for SD?". Plus didnt SD have rivers or brees? I somewhat remember elway refusing to play for colts and sparking giant issues- trades, AFL, etc. I think the pick was traded for too, but more of a forced deal. 

They did get offense LT and brees(2nd round and bunch other picks), so didnt already have QB. hmmm. 

I still put Vick right there after the elway, luck, and law. I feel like people forgot how he was the living cheat code for some time. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Maybe my isnt, cause I dont recall that. I do remember SD had terrible ownership and rep, that many avoided ala eli deal as well. Was there any "I aint playin for SD?". Plus didnt SD have rivers or brees? I somewhat remember elway refusing to play for colts and sparking giant issues- trades, AFL, etc. I think the pick was traded for too, but more of a forced deal. 

They did get offense LT and brees(2nd round and bunch other picks), so didnt already have QB. hmmm. 

I still put Vick right there after the elway, luck, and law. I feel like people forgot how he was the living cheat code for some time. 

Vick and Chargers couldn’t land on a rookie deal https://theathletic.com/2535152/2021/04/27/the-2001-nfl-draft-trade-that-changed-the-falcons-chargers-and-qb-play-forever/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Vick and Chargers couldn’t land on a rookie deal https://theathletic.com/2535152/2021/04/27/the-2001-nfl-draft-trade-that-changed-the-falcons-chargers-and-qb-play-forever/

Thats part of it, SD had a AWFUL rep and it goes to the money. I take that a slight * in regards to the trading of the pick. The way Archie handle SD behind the cameras, was OG gangsta style. That was soon after and the same method were being used.......SD was cheap and hated paying rookies top money(they had lots of hold-outs), they were partly right cause in 2011 it was changed. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

 No he doesn’t he can see that Young is a better player.  Cuz he has eyes

He thinks Young is the next Patrick Mahomes. If other GMs actually thought this the Bears phones would be blowing up. It’s easy to hype your guy up and say sensational things like “the next Mahomes” when your career isn’t on the line. The Bears aren’t risking it and rightfully so. Get more picks and address one of their other 1000 needs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...