Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

‘Draft Qb. Panthers can own the South’ Dan O.


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

this was an interesting segment yesterday. Some of you may have seen it  on ESPN 

he us all aboard the Stroud or AR train…says Panthers could own the South for 10 years. Of course Hasselback chimes in with Garrapolo.  Im like,  just say ‘no’ on the injury machine that he is 
 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/02/28/panthers-espn-dan-orlovsky-nfc-south-qb-nfl-draft/

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Don't watch ESPN.  Surprised anyone does honestly. 

Come on now… don’t be so grumpy ….Spring’s coming 

he did have an entertaining, and. I believe, good take.  ….besides he was almost one of our ‘all star’ coaching staff 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

The best QB from this class won't be one of the top four picked.

Hooker ?  Is that your preference?  It could be they trade back in the first or up in the second if he is there…

i readily admit I’m not a Levis fan.  He shrinks in big moments and is a turnover machine 

we have a lot of qb evaluation gurus on staff now.  I’ll trust what they do, or don’t do…they are getting paid and it’s their longtime employment and reputation at stake….I’ll trust the selection even if they do Levis and that’s a lot for me. 

the draft will be very interesting and exciting this year….the first two rds anyway.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing Dan O said when talking about being close to joining the Panthers, he said "I like their plan at the QB position". It's hard to say how much insight he has from the interview process, but clearly enough to know the direction the team wants to go, and he approves of it. Is he just reinforcing what he already knows they want to do?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...