Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

‘Draft Qb. Panthers can own the South’ Dan O.


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NorthTryon said:

It would be glorious though to have a Patriots like run where we were consistent and everyone else was in turmoil for 10-15yrs!

Might as well feel hopeful in the off season

i mean, why not be optimistic and if you can’t be optimistic in the off season, when  can you be 

the scourge has been banished…a new sheriff is in town 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

All true. But when they got in the playoffs the dominated the competition.  It's one thing to cakewalk through your division but its a totally different level when you cakewalk through the playoffs and the SB.

Getting to video tape the opposing teams practice sure seemed to help them during the first half of one particular SB...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im fine with either of the 4 QB's honestly.

 

Draft them and develop them. I like having the "unknown" factor when it comes to these QB's.

 

We already know what these vet QB's are. 

These vets are already better than these "unknowns", we know that.The unkown angle just gives a built in excuse when they dont work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

But he didnt get one..hmm intetesting.

But you can tell he dove into the roster and the division and came to same conclusion we all have for years now. Get a fuging QB and run the south because the division is cheeks 

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

I could definitely see that happening.

Could easily be Hooker, not saying he'd be top 10 in the league but he's getting the opposite treatment of Levis. One guy was horrible and gets tons of excuses, the other guy put up great stats but gets no credit. And it's not small school BS, he put up good numbers against good teams

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I could see this QB class mirroring the 2014 QB draft class.

Blake Bortles, Johnny Manziel and Teddy Bridgewater in the first, Garropolo in the second. And those are the highlights...

Remember how much hype there was over Bortles and Manziel? Woof. Yeah, it could be that year again. Heck, 2022 could have been that year for all we know.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Blake Bortles, Johnny Manziel and Teddy Bridgewater in the first, Garropolo in the second. And those are the highlights...

Remember how much hype there was over Bortles and Manziel? Woof. Yeah, it could be that year again. Heck, 2022 could have been that year for all we know.

 

There isn't a AR comp, but Levis--> Bortles (strong arm, prototypical size) Young-->Manziel (undersized, athletic, moxy). Stroud-->Bridgewater (checks all the boxes). 

You left our Carr too, he and Jimmy G. were my main point.  Two second rounders ended up saving that entire draft class.  Hooker could end up being like Carr from this class as the the most accomplished when all said and done.  Probably another day 2 or day 3 QB will trend like Jimmy G.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...