David Newton's tweet deserves own thread

[shaqattaq]

20 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I expect that to be a big part of the discussion.

Fitterer mentioned that if you really like a quarterback, you need to go get him.

But then also said that if you're going to make that kind of commitment to a quarterback, you absolutely need to have conviction on him, not just general belief.

So like I said, I think those discussions happen over this weekend and next week becomes "sh-t or get off the pot" time in regards to Carr.

IF we get Carr, I hope that we don't go after a QB at #9. We have too many holes to have the top FA QB, one of the top draft QB's and a drafted QB from last year that never played a snap of meaningful football. Way too many resources tied up ay 1 position even if it is the most important position.

[glenwo2]

On 3/1/2023 at 1:29 PM, frankw said:

Derek Carr or Sam Darnold...

How about neither.

We should go with No QB, and run the Wildcat 24/7 just to see the Chaos.

[Basbear]

If I didnt have sooo many warning points id be in here acting out, the ironic levels are TOO HIGH!!

[top dawg]

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

If I didnt have sooo many warning points id be in here acting out, the ironic levels are TOO HIGH!!

Just say what you have to say in a nice way.

[glenwo2]

On 3/1/2023 at 3:15 PM, TLGPanthersFan said:

If we do sign Carr our defense is gonna need to show out and the offensive line is gonna have to play the best it ever has. 
Because Carr ain’t gonna scramble and create opportunities.

I am looking toward the future and I don’t see any Super Bowls with Carr at QB. 

 Don't look now but you just made an indirect compliment about your sworn enemy Sam Darnold. 

Edited March 3, 2023 by glenwo2

[Basbear]

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Just say what you have to say in a nice way.

Just for some posters, I had to make it a rule to stick to panthers/NFL. Plus a couple of posters have fewer rules than others, very unfair to see a thread made at the similar times and early one gets lock'd........ Just need to finish before I even get my high blood pressure higher, hate hypocrites. Let Travis "thee rock" kelce end this before i get caught up....

 

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Just for some posters, I had to make it a rule to stick to panthers/NFL. Plus a couple of posters have fewer rules than others, very unfair to see a thread made at the similar times and early one gets lock'd........ Just need to finish before I even get my high blood pressure higher, hate hypocrites. Let Travis "thee rock" kelce end this before i get caught up....

 

I know the feeling. 

[ncstatekwi]

Mr. Scot on the PROWL...... 

[Shocker]

On 3/1/2023 at 1:19 PM, top dawg said:

Huddlers seem to be zeroing in on the David Carr or Sam Darnold parts of David Newton's tweet, but neither one bothers me. It's always been about value as far as I'm concerned. 

David Tepper emphasized that we needed to be smarter with our resources. I don't believe that we're going to win any Carr battle based on that alone, and we may not end up with Darnold if the market gets too stupid, but it's all about the money, and I could see Darnold being a better value than Carr in their respective roles (one a starter, and one a bridge starter or legit backup). 

All that being said, we are obviously surveying the scrap heap for possible treasure---you know, the "one man's thrash thing, giving serious thought to the draft prospects of course, and keeping Matt Corral in our hearts and minds. 

Some may not like the tweet, and hope that Newton is full of poo, but it's actually music to my ears. 

 

And one more thing: Gardner Minshew, come on down!

We need to bring back 

 

Or at least get a mid-level reporter to cover the Panthers

[Mr. Scot]

20 minutes ago, Basbear said:

very unfair to see a thread made at the similar times and early one gets lock'd........

If you're referring to the Richardson thread...

...and it ultimately was fixed.

[Basbear]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

If you're referring to the Richardson thread...

...and it ultimately was fixed.

Its among many others, I still remember Jeremy locking threads only to start his own......same as the one lock'd. That was during the "IF YOU START A THREAD :< THE TITLE NEEDS TO BE PERFECT1!!!!1!" Of course like many of the rules, got enforced then gotten about shortly after. 

[Mr. Scot]

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Its among many others, I still remember Jeremy locking threads only to start his own......same as the one lock'd. That was during the "IF YOU START A THREAD :< THE TITLE NEEDS TO BE PERFECT1!!!!1!" Of course like many of the rules, got enforced then gotten about shortly after. 

I can't speak for Jeremy.

For myself, if I start a thread with news that turns out to be fake, I expect it to be locked.

Likewise, if I start a thread with news that someone already posted, I expect it to be merged...or locked. None of that's an issue.

Today's news just wasn't confirmed until much later, but in the end they were right.

[Chad_Cota]

I don't see us drafting a QB if we stay at 9.

[Jon Snow]

16 minutes ago, Chad_Cota said:

I don't see us drafting a QB if we stay at 9.

I get the impression that they will trade down if they cannot move up for their 1st choice. My initial guess is if they sign Carr they trade down and go TE and WR. Probably try to get a qb in the 2nd and go defense from there.