Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Combine Drills: Quarterback Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

These times are ridiculous for guys this size.

I know The Athletic and DJer are both big on Schoonmaker.  Saw it reported that many clubs are big fans of him, scouting community is preferential to his resume.  

The TE class makes up for a rather shallow pond of top WRs this year.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love Washington, Musgrave, Kincaid, Kraft, etc. .This staff values blocking in their TE and Washington just moved the sleds effortlessly. 

We'll have to give up a 2nd to get our QB1...not sure which guy will still be around. I really, really hope the SF 2nd is the pick that gets packaged and not #39.

Stroud/AR + Washington would be NASTY.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If we trade up for a QB, I hope we keep pick 39 for a TE.

Yeah I hope they are coveting 39 and next year's 1st in most talks.  There's going to be legit EDGE and TE talent in R2.  Those would be my priority keeps.  

If we can figure something out to move up with the batch of 2025's 1st, 24' 2nd-4th rounders, and 61, I would find it to be very successful negotiations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I have a feeling Washington is going to be a star at the next level.

 

His stats were not great because he played with the best TE in football. I think he can be more of a receiving threat at the next level when he is the clear cut #1 TE. His blocking is already elite.

I like him a lot but tempering expectations.  There've been guys like him before with the monster label that weren't hits.  Really exciting prospect though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...