Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to aggressive pursue trade up to get a QB

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AggieLean said:

Might as well try to get up to #1

That's it!  We are going to have to sell our souls to move up to the top pick.  The only QB worth it, is CJ Stroud in my opinion.  I believe he will certainly be the number one pick.  If another team moves up and draft Stroud, I believe we should stay put at 9 and draft Richardson or Bryce Young. (Not really a fan of Young due to size)  If neither are there, go BPA.  If Levis is there at 9, I wouldn't be oppose to drafting him, but at that point I would trade back.  Overall, its Stroud at 1# or stay put.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, ncfan said:

There’s not a dam team in the league that’d say I’ll take 31st rd picks over a Joe Burrow.  Especially if they didn’t have a top 10 QB

 

im doing this no questions asked 

that mock was a dream scenario 

Ohio State coaches literally preferred Fields to Stroud - he went 11th in his Draft and has been so-so in the NFL. 

Young is 5'10" and plays at 180lbs. He's going to inspire Jim Ross gifs. 

Richardson is a project.

Who are you trading 3 first round picks away for here?!

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm fine walking away with any of those 3 with the #9 pick (or a slightly higher pick if it just costs one of our 2nd round picks this year), but damn nobody here is worth the gamble that a lot of you are willing to make.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:
10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed. But it's not for Joe Burrow. It's for a complete NFL unknown you're hoping like hell you're right about. I'm not opposed to it. I just acknowledge what a massive risk and roll of the dice it would be.

It’s not Joe Burrow
But it’s the guy, a certain someone who played in the league awhile and is now our QB COACH, compared him to Joe Burrow.

I’ll take that guys evaluation over some Huddler who probably never watch more than 3 full games in the man’s career

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Ohio State coaches literally preferred Fields to Stroud - he went 11th in his Draft and has been so-so in the NFL. 

You keep saying this while continuing to ignore that you're talking about a true freshman Stroud vs. a junior Fields who was coming off a 45 TD season. There's no QB competition when you have a rising junior who just threw for 45 TDs.

Just stop with this embarrassment.

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Ohio State coaches literally preferred Fields to Stroud - he went 11th in his Draft and has been so-so in the NFL. 

Young is 5'10" and plays at 180lbs. He's going to inspire Jim Ross gifs. 

Richardson is a project.

Who are you trading 3 first round picks away for here?!

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm fine walking away with any of those 3 with the #9 pick (or a slightly higher pick if it just costs one of our 2nd round picks this year), but damn nobody here is worth the gamble that a lot of you are willing to make.

Ohio States coaches preferred Haskins over Burrow.

 

I’ll take an NFL coaches and scouts evaluation over theirs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ncfan said:

It’s not Joe Burrow
But it’s the guy, a certain someone who played in the league awhile and is now our QB COACH, compared him to Joe Burrow.

I’ll take that guys evaluation over some Huddler who probably never watch more than 3 full games in the man’s career

Good for you. We're just having a conversation here. Some of y'all get ridiculously personal with this stuff.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

As for the actual QB... I'm fine with either Young, Stroud, or Richardson. I can understand an argument for any of the three. 

 

We need to hit on any one of those.

If we whiff, it would be catastrophic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Rags said:

Carter might get a bit of the Tunsil effect, personally I'd feel safer. 

he's by far the best player in the draft. I can't see both Arizona and Chicago both in desperate need of d-line help passing on him

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You keep saying this while continuing to ignore that you're talking about a true freshman Stroud vs. a junior Fields who was coming off a 45 TD season. There's no QB competition when you have a rising junior who just threw for 45 TDs.

Just stop with this embarrassment.

I'm not talking about an 18 year old vs a 21 year old, I'm talking about as QBs in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Ohio State coaches literally preferred Fields to Stroud - he went 11th in his Draft and has been so-so in the NFL. 

Young is 5'10" and plays at 180lbs. He's going to inspire Jim Ross gifs. 

Richardson is a project.

Who are you trading 3 first round picks away for here?!

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm fine walking away with any of those 3 with the #9 pick (or a slightly higher pick if it just costs one of our 2nd round picks this year), but damn nobody here is worth the gamble that a lot of you are willing to make.

Well, it's up to the FO. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...