Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to aggressive pursue trade up to get a QB


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Cdparr7 said:

Yeah about the only huddle “insider” I halfway listen to is the dude that called the Josh McCown hire and the Faucet guy that appears randomly.

I get your point but there are at least 3 dudes on here that I have taken note of that have insider knowledge.  I will leave that to you to figure out who.  But people on here do post some inside baseball level poo.  It will never be me as the only guy I knew in the organization left a long time ago so I dont fake poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Eric4280 said:

I partially think I’m also attached to our firsts because it’s a yearly bbq at my place with all my buddies (live in NJ and have friends of all teams) and the next two years would be empty haha. That with I’m a little less sold on stroud than most. But I do absolutely trust and love the braintrust behind the team now.

Ah .. We can find other reason to BBQ .. Cat day ,, New toilet paper with 3 ply, Wife wasn’t mad at me all week.. Keep the bbq going no matter what.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Tijuana Tribune  

Sounds legit.


I think this is the guy that tweeted that the Packers GM was “disgusted” with Aaron Rodgers and got his ass chewed all over Twitter because he never actually spoke to anyone, and later said it was just an “opinion” piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I get your point but there are at least 3 dudes on here that I have taken note of that have insider knowledge.  I will leave that to you to figure out who.  But people on here do post some inside baseball level poo.  It will never be me as the only guy I knew in the organization left a long time ago so I dont fake poo

@TheSpecialJuan

@rippadonn

and...

@CPantherKing

Did I get it right?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ncfan said:

It’s the same thing She like Zac Lutrell used to post a lot more around draft time about things they’re hearing.  People who didn’t like what they had to say with the info they passed along.  And people would lose their poo and would get nasty.  I remember when she had Justin Fields QB4 over Wilson and Lance.  People thought she was stupid/dumb called her names etc.

Fields ended up going to be QB4.

And just like Zac.  They just quit wasting their time.

yo man you need to read her post history before you go any further, she was saying willis was at the top of the board last year at 5

 

her post history is pretty laid out, no need to white knight her

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

I remembered when I got shitted on when I said it was stupid to try and make a playoff push. We needed to tank, but NOOO, we just had to win some shitty games against other shitty teams. How did that work out for us?

This opinion is based on what??

I think some fans forget this is real ppl lives not madden.. 

Ppl money, family life, job security is based off of on field performance.. How is them losing for draft picks going to help them??

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

This opinion is based on what??

I think some fans forget this is real ppl lives not madden.. 

Ppl money, family life, job security is based off of on field performance.. How is them losing for draft picks going to help them??

That is correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

yo man you need to read her post history before you go any further, she was saying willis was at the top of the board last year at 5

 

her post history is pretty laid out, no need to white knight her

I’ve followed her awhile a lot longer than 2020

09F0E3F4-7CF1-42A1-B256-1D2CE9B711C6.jpeg

 

like I said Luttrel who the the head of the riot report and Roaring Riot used to post here like her posting stuff they heard.  And it was the same thing. 1 maybe 2 things didn’t come true.  Other people who didn’t like what they had to say, jumped all over him.  And he quit posting.  Verge essentially did the same thing.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Not if you pick right, same principle with 

Drafting bad qbs just because.

Pick what right?? 
You keep liveing in this fantasy world where somebody available all the time and you are in a perfect situation to get them..

We’ve tried this.. Stafford, Wilson, Watson said no.. Mahomes, Allen nor Burrows will be available to us.. 
 

What is your plan??

Edited by Sub Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Pick what right?? 
You keep liveing in this fantasy world where somebody available all the time and you are in a perfect situation to get them..

We’ve tried this.. Stafford, Wilson, Watson said no.. Mahomes, Allen nor Burrows will be available to us.. 
 

What is your plan??

So you dont know what picking means?

It's a real world concept.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...