Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens can’t be this dumb? They’re a smart organization right?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, frankw said:

Two first round picks and a likely fully guaranteed 200 million dollar contract? He's good but he's not going to dig the Falcons out of that hole with that much tied up in acquiring him. Let them try 🤷‍♂️

It would still be an awful team, but then the Ravens will probably take a shot at moving up to first overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Two first round picks and a likely fully guaranteed 200 million dollar contract? He's good but he's not going to dig the Falcons out of that hole with that much tied up in acquiring him. Let them try 🤷‍♂️

It would be a very similar situation offensively though. Possible elite TE in Pitts (Andrews) and a young WR in London (Brown). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

It would still be an awful team, but then the Ravens will probably take a shot at moving up to first overall.

Right that's why Fitterer/Reich better backup the "aggressive" talk and not get left in the wind. Hopefully they aren't anything like some of the wallet pinchers here or we're in trouble.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the ‘wind’ is behind New Orleans and Carr, Panthers probably could have had Carr if they really wanted. 
If the wind is behind Crappy teams that get these top two or three QBs, there is One of them I would sweat. Stroud.

AR may be a worry but not for two or three years. Good luck to the team that rolls with Young that high. 
 Not one of them is a sure thing. 
 

Panthes need to play the Panthers’ game, not a reactive game. I think they are, with this lukewarm courtesy meeting interest level re Carr. 
I am really really against giving up all the draft picks to move up, but if they believe so strongly in it, like, if that is their plan, okay I will give it another look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...