Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JOE PERSON: Panthers will not pursue Lamar Jackson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

This is just a part of a game. I've heard  a few people say on the boob tube today say that there's no way he's playing for that.

Maybe he doesn’t.  But sitting out hasn’t worked out well for players in the past.  He may very well have to take less than what the Ravens have previously offered 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Maybe he doesn’t.  But sitting out hasn’t worked out well for players in the past.  He may very well have to take less than what the Ravens have previously offered 

Perhaps. But unlike what some believe here, I don't believe that he's anywhere near done, and even if he sits out a season, he's still a top franchise QB in his prime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Smithers said:

He doesn’t deserve a fully guaranteed contract.  That being said, we are stupid if we aren’t calling and offering 45M per year with at least half the total contract guaranteed.  Sure, the Ravens would likely match the offer.  But you gotta friggin try.  Jackson makes this a team that can compete for a SB next season 

That's kinda the thing.

Any reasonable offer we make they'd likely match. At that point, all you've really done is negotiate the deal for them.

If you seriously wanna get him, you've gotta offer something they won't match. But then you've gotta pay that amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

That's kinda the thing.

Any reasonable offer we make they'd likely match. At that point, all you've really done is negotiate the deal for them.

If you seriously wanna get him, you've gotta offer something they won't match. But then you've gotta pay that amount.

Too bad Gettleman isn’t their GM.  He’d rescind the deal and Lamar would be a FA

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm only in favor of this if they make it like cigarettes.  Shouldn't be plastered all over the presentation of the game.
    • Yes but this is under the assumption that most of the players are susceptible to this sort of coercing from those type of elements. I think those actual cases are rare. Plus the sportsbooks are more motivated than most to stamp it out because it loses them money. It's just a natural side effect of having gambling at all. IMO, better for it to be legal. Now, I do find it insanely hypocritical(but also typical) that all these sports leagues that once turned their noses up and were very high and mighty about sports gambling are so openly supporting it now that the megabucks are rolling in.
    • Well I should also say another caveat is positional value. You have to be careful violating that. For the scenarios you are describing, those are also things that free agency is for. Free agency should always set up the draft. Improve the roster and then go shopping for things to potentially take your roster up a notch.  Lastly, we are in scenario 2. Our roster is still not good and we have holes at most position groups. We are actually in the "BPA All Day" range.  
×
×
  • Create New...