Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are now the betting favorite for the #1 pick


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

So what happens if they give up tons of draft capital to go get a QB, and he fails? Or he gets injured? Or a key position (to help him develop) gets injured?

Plus as of right now, you'd be bringing a young QB to a team without a strong receiving corp (who's the #2 or the slot?), TE group (Tremble and Thomas are not legit receiving threats), and questions at the RB position (are they going to overpay Foreman or just roll with Hubbard). What about o-line depth? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Tbe said:

A miss at QB could mean those ‘few draft picks’ turn into missing out on a better QB prospect next year.

If we had some fat college donkey and his college coaching staff I’d be more worried about that. This coaching staff in this division won’t be picking in the t10 even if we roll with Darnold for another year, and the 2 QBs everybody wants are going top 3-5 unless they have terrible seasons and turn into pumpkins in which case we won’t want them anyways.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

So what happens if they give up tons of draft capital to go get a QB, and he fails? Or he gets injured? Or a key position (to help him develop) gets injured?

Plus as of right now, you'd be bringing a young QB to a team without a strong receiving corp (who's the #2 or the slot?), TE group (Tremble and Thomas are not legit receiving threats), and questions at the RB position (are they going to overpay Foreman or just roll with Hubbard). What about o-line depth? 

what if the panthers don’t trade up, take a really fine LB, and he becomes a breakout star?

 

they continue to wallow in the pits of mediocrity is the answer

also lol “depth” which is the 53 positions on the roster don’t have to make bankable players before a team makes a run at a QB?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

So what happens if they give up tons of draft capital to go get a QB, and he fails? Or he gets injured? Or a key position (to help him develop) gets injured?

Plus as of right now, you'd be bringing a young QB to a team without a strong receiving corp (who's the #2 or the slot?), TE group (Tremble and Thomas are not legit receiving threats), and questions at the RB position (are they going to overpay Foreman or just roll with Hubbard). What about o-line depth? 

What if some jackass runs a red light and tbones me on the way to work?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

If they do this and it's a miss, it's going to be a very painful miss...

Not necessarily. Multiple teams have had a lot of success after trading a lot to move up for a QB who wound up busting. 49ers, Eagles, Rams all very recent and applicable examples. If Reich is the real deal we’ll figure out QB sooner or later even if it doesn’t turn out to be whoever we get in this draft if we trade up.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

A miss at QB could mean those ‘few draft picks’ turn into missing out on a better QB prospect next year.

You are assuming people won’t be back here next year saying that no QB in 2024 is worth our first round pick. 
You are also assuming we will have a QB better than this year fall to us next year. 
Pretty obvious that, unless the team falls off a cliff, we probably won’t be drafting high enough to get a top QB in the first round. 
Unless every QB coming out in the 2024 supposedly stacked class is good, they won’t be, then we will be right back where we started every off-season. Arguing the same darn thing. 
We have no idea if any of the QBs next year will be good and if they are we will probably still have to pay to move up and it will be expensive. 
Panthers won too many games this year and really put themselves in between a rock and a hard place. 
I don’t envy the FO of the decisions they will have to make. 
 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

If I had to hazard a guess I'd say that most of this board is drowning in debt. 

I'd say it's an incorrect assertion to equate how a person feels about trading up/standing pat in the draft with how they run their personal finances. 

The NFL is a league that has proven time and time again that going with the "safe" option gets you nowhere. I understand you have a pathological aversion to using future draft capital to move up, but sometimes you must, as they say, "risk it for the biscuit". 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

Not necessarily. Multiple teams have had a lot of success after trading a lot to move up for a QB who wound up busting. 49ers, Eagles, Rams all very recent and applicable examples. If Reich is the real deal we’ll figure out QB sooner or later even if it doesn’t turn out to be whoever we get in this draft if we trade up.

Good point! Based on a very small sample size, it looks like the opposite.  Rams went to the big game with Goff and won not too long after acquiring him (yes they traded him away to do so).  The Eagles won one with Wentz (injured at the time) and went to another one not too long after.  The Niners made a nice playoff push this year and if Lance was healthy who knows?  The last few teams that have traded up for a top 3 QB used their extra cap space wisely and had good coaching which made them very competitive.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Why?

Have you not been paying attention to who makes up this coaching staff? These are guys who knows offense and knows QBs. If there's a coaching staff that you should trust with deciding on a QB, it's this one. 

Frank fuggin Reich

Jim Caldwell

Josh McCown

Just these guys alone should be enough to warrant confidence in this team's ability to choose a good QB. It is for me anyway. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Navy_football said:

then I'm sure your family would hope you weren't driving a brand new Porsche that you purchased with a home equity loan and you skimped on auto insurance

So you’re saying you should always drive a run down crappy car so you didn’t have to worry to get hit by another car?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Growl said:

what if the panthers don’t trade up, take a really fine LB, and he becomes a breakout star?

 

they continue to wallow in the pits of mediocrity is the answer

also lol “depth” which is the 53 positions on the roster don’t have to make bankable players before a team makes a run at a QB?

Or they pick 3 other positions of need and become a better TEAM this year. Then another good player next year.

But... they also pick a QB they didn't have to mortgage the rest of the TEAM for. Because they're such great coaches, they don't need the #1 pick to get a good QB that'll work for a really good team - see San Francisco. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

If I had to hazard a guess I'd say that most of this board is drowning in debt. 

Lol we are fans cheering for a football team, OF COURSE a majority want them to be aggressive.  Most football fans want immediate gratification, it's why the 7 year process (a joke) pissed off so many people.  It's why a future 1st apparently holds less value that a current.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Martin said:

So you’re saying you should always drive a run down crappy car so you didn’t have to worry to get hit by another car?

No you drive a car that you didn't have to take out a second mortgage to buy. Might not be a Porsche but doesn't have to be a run down crappy car. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...