Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We’re trading for #1 pick !!!


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

image.png.b885c159683b54b7b7927a3207990988.png

This is intriguing....surely speculation, but what if. Get a little bit back from HOU to make sure they get "there guy" while we still get ours. 

No guarantee that HOU doesn't just take who they want, but if they REALLY want Young and we bluff it enough, they could take the bait. 

you have a open mind and see this......trying to reason with others on this, given the tiny likelihood, its open season........

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Varking said:

 

The Bears had a good reason--they have a ton of cap room, and Fields is in year 3, his "make or break" year.  They needed a player now, not in 2025.  The Panthers, on the other hand, need cap space and, frankly, would never get a first round draft pick in a trade for Moore--maybe a second or third.  I They have some young WRs who could be turning the corner (Marshall, Smith) and I think they will add one in the draft and in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

To give his input to rhule and help run scouting and the draft preparation, but make no mistake Rhule had 100% roster control as it was in his contract. 

Scott Fitterer absolutely deserves a large helping of blame for the miserable failures he and Rhule cooked up. Fitterer pined for Darnold and gave up so many picks, he had to trade one excellent player to recoup them.

Then he traded another excellent player to move up, only to move down and pick the fourth- or fifth-best QB in the draft. Now there's only one excellent player left, and he's gotta go soon, because his talent is stinking up the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Castavar said:

IDK why some people from the media and on this forum keep counting this years 1st when we swapped.

We only gave up a 1st, 2nd (2) and a player on the last year of his rookie deal. This was an absolute steal to move up 8 slots for the top selection of QBs!!

He was extended. There's three years left on his deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Scott Fitterer absolutely deserves a large helping of blame for the miserable failures he and Rhule cooked up. Fitterer pined for Darnold and gave up so many picks, he had to trade one excellent player to recoup them.

Then he traded another excellent player to move up, only to move down and pick the fourth- or fifth-best QB in the draft. Now there's only one excellent player left, and he's gotta go soon, because his talent is stinking up the roster.

You need to be dismissed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...