Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Size bros, I did some research and you're correct. Here's some stats about this year's QB class


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Shocker said:

My goodness…you say he sucked against Texas but won the game for Bama and also beat LSU.  Bama had more talent than Ohio State last season?  What?  Where?

Young had more big wins by far.  In fact Stroud never did anything against the only good team he played Michigan.  
 

CJ Stroud had literally 1 big game in his career…and lost

He lost to LSU while going 25/51 passing. What are you talking about? 
 

Wins are a team stat, not a QB stat. Ken Dorsey won tons of games in college and a bunch of the guys he beat during college went on to have significantly better careers in the NFL than him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Varking said:

He lost to LSU while going 25/51 passing. What are you talking about? 
 

Wins are a team stat, not a QB stat. Ken Dorsey won tons of games in college and a bunch of the guys he beat during college went on to have significantly better careers in the NFL than him. 

If someone is bragging about wins, Stetson  Bennett should be their choice. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Brent Gregory said:

Every other Mayfield pass was batted down last year. He's got 2-3 inches on Young. That and Youngs a natural 190 pound guy is plenty enough reason to run as fast away from him as possible.  

Pj is 5’11 but got wayyyy less batted balls than baker who is 6’1. With ur logic, the shorter QB should have more batted balls.

Batted balls are not just abt height…

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...