Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thomas Davis - Not so fast my friend!

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

Absolutely, it’s like Fitt said, you don’t trade up for a guy unless you conviction for them, if they are truly dead set on AR, so be it. Like you, I’m good with whoever, except levis lol 

Pretty much every tidbit that comes out confirms it's not just one guy they have "conviction" for.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted
Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

With all due respect nobody will care if you are done with this franchise.

 

If a player makes you leave you were never a real fan to begin with.

bullshit motherfuger i suffered through the rhule seasons, jerry richardsons pie charts etc. if they traded dj moore and a bunch of picks for a qb who literally cant throw the football then we out

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

bullshit motherfuger i suffered through the rhule seasons, jerry richardsons pie charts etc. if they traded dj moore and a bunch of picks for a qb who literally cant throw the football then we out

I'd laugh if we drafted Levis with the 1st, started Dalton for the first half of the season, and signed Sam Darnold as backup just to see CamWhoaaCam go back to wherever he came from a mere three months ago.

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I’m in the minority, but I’d love this. With that being said, I doubt it happens, I doubt TD would show our cards this early, or even at all. A couple of analyst have broke down ARs “bad” games and how they really weren’t all his fault. One said his WRs were never ever open.
 

Yes he’s very raw, but I’ve seen several users on here say no matter who we draft, with this staff, they are good with it. Why can’t it be the same for this kid? Anyway, it’s young or stroud, this is just for clicks. 

He's raw, but he's calm and moves well in the pocket, throws with anticipation and improved as the year went on.

The negative is that he needs to improve his throwing mechanics (mainly footwork) or he'll always be inaccurate. If you've got Reich, McCown and Dalton in the building I can see you talking yourself into taking the QB with the highest upside.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

bullshit motherfuger i suffered through the rhule seasons, jerry richardsons pie charts etc. if they traded dj moore and a bunch of picks for a qb who literally cant throw the football then we out

Same here, plus fifteen years of Hurney and plenty of other sh-t.

So bottom line, if I'm gonna bail, it'll be because of something way bigger than the team making a draft pick I didn't agree with.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I know they are clowns but to dismiss the points made does not make sense. The tape does not lie. Combine results do not change how you scout these QB’s and AR will not be the pick. No way what TD said comes true, the staff is not that dumb. CJ and Young are on another level of QB and they will not risk their job by drafting AR number one overall. 

I mean they were talking about his vertical leap and his broad jump, asking how they're going to help him in the NFL i.e. they're not playing leapfrog.

They're simply a measure of explosiveness - it's a silly argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...