Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kaye's X-Factor: System Fit

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The vast majority of people I've seen preferring Stroud (myself included) generally add "but I'd be okay with Young".

I've not seen all that many aggressively bash either one.

There is just a small subset that bashes, most discussions have been great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivory Panther Proficient

Ivory Panther

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The vast majority of people I've seen preferring Stroud (myself included) generally add "but I'd be okay with Young".

I've not seen all that many aggressively bash either one.

You literally went at me with some disrespect calling me a "kid". 

Some ppl called you out on it, and instead of apologizing, you doubled down. 

That was uncalled for as I have never disrespected you.

you also keep accusing me of having different profile which until you said it, didn't even realized ppl did that.

I have many other example of a few other ppl here.

There are genuine "But I will be ok with either QB" ppl, who you can tell are flexible & don't personally attack others. That hasn't been you from my experience.

That is the aggressiveness I'm talking about. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stumpy Grand Master

Stumpy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The vast majority of people I've seen preferring Stroud (myself included) generally add "but I'd be okay with Young".

I've not seen all that many aggressively bash either one.

Lmao... sanctimonious as always.

Run a search of the main forum for "midget" and type that post out again.

I prefer Stroud as well. But, to pretend that Stroud fanboys are some stoic jurists, while those who prefer Young are rabid, emotional fanatics who attack anyone who disagrees would be hilarious if it hadnt become so expected in this forum.

The Tinderbox is less toxic than this place, for zods sake!

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivory Panther Proficient

Ivory Panther

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Lmao... sanctimonious as always.

Run a search of the main forum for "midget" and type that post out again.

I prefer Stroud as well. But, to pretend that Stroud fanboys are some stoic jurists, while those who prefer Young are rabid, emotional fanatics who attack anyone who disagrees would be hilarious if it hadnt become so expected in this forum.

The Tinderbox is less toxic than this place, for zods sake!

THANK YOU!!!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Growl said:

we’re talking about quarterbacks, the system should fit the player not the other way around

Disagree 1000000000%. The "system" is everything an offense does. From QB to RB, from WRs to TEs, from FBs to the O-Line. You do not design their entire world around your QB. If he gets injured, if he jets for more money elsewhere ... you're doomed. You bring in the best QB available who can run what you the head coach, and the 10+ other coaches on offense, want your offense to be like.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Lmao... sanctimonious as always.

Run a search of the main forum for "midget" and type that post out again.

I prefer Stroud as well. But, to pretend that Stroud fanboys are some stoic jurists, while those who prefer Young are rabid, emotional fanatics who attack anyone who disagrees would be hilarious if it hadnt become so expected in this forum.

The Tinderbox is less toxic than this place, for zods sake!

 

Since the new HC hire, this place has absolutely mellowed. The excitement level is heightened, and the toxicity has abated dramatically. If @Ivory Panther thinks it's bad now? He never would have survived that.

Edited by Gerry Green
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ElSporto said:

What in Jesus christs holy name you fools talking about?? This is insanity. The most mediocre franchise in nfl history has 5 years of crummy football and all of you are jonesing for status quo? This is nonsense. Even the Stroud truther analysts - of which there are relatively few - openly admit he’s a high floor, low ceiling prospect. 

Fittco traded all those assets - including known commodity Dj - to bloop a single to right field? This fan base is starved for the next Goff/Garoppolo/Carr??

You guys are on-brand, man. An epic trade to 1 and the poultry flocks. Definition of insanity. 

My god if I read one more comment on the Georgia game… Kurt Cousins could write a book on annual one-off good games. 

You’re all getting timeouts. 

Which ALT is this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ivory Panther said:

You literally went at me with some disrespect calling me a "kid". 

Some ppl called you out on it, and instead of apologizing, you doubled down. 

That was uncalled for as I have never disrespected you.

you also keep accusing me of having different profile which until you said it, didn't even realized ppl did that.

I have many other example of a few other ppl here.

There are genuine "But I will be ok with either QB" ppl, who you can tell are flexible & don't personally attack others. That hasn't been you from my experience.

That is the aggressiveness I'm talking about. 

Calling you kid actually has nothing to do with who you prefer and more to do with the fact that you act like one.

If all you did was advocate for Young, I doubt anybody would have an issue. What you do instead is accuse others of ulterior motives, tout your own supposed virtue and continuously play the victim.

Rayzor was correct.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Disagree 1000000000%. The "system" is everything an offense does. From QB to RB, from WRs to TEs, from FBs to the O-Line. You do not design their entire world around your QB. If he gets injured, if he jets for more money elsewhere ... you're doomed. You bring in the best QB available who can run what you the head coach, and the 10+ other coaches on offense, want your offense to be like.

 

Which is why you almost have to laugh at those that say. "Pick the best QB, the coach may not be here in 3 years." lol If the Coach gets his QB, he may be here until he retires. The player absolutely has to fit what the Coach wants. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...