Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BJ Ojulari is scheduled to visit the #Panthers


CAPantherFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Looking.at the talent that should be available,  looks to me we can get a better edge or TE at 39, than we could receiver. 

I tend to agree. That said, 39 should just be BPA. For whatever reason, I think one of a CB, edge, WR or TE who has 1st round value (especially in other years at edge/TE) will be there at 39. We still have plenty of holes to fill. CJ, Donte, YGM/?, Thielen, Chark and Hurst are all replaceable and/or not long term options so we shouldn’t pass over true BPA for any of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I would like to trade up for Zay Flowers if we can. I still don't trust this WR core we still bottom 5 in the league and Chark is injury prone and Thielen is aging. Get another shifty/explosive WR like Zay and we back in business.

 

 

I'd be more apt to trade up for Mayer or Kincaid if they're there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

I tend to agree. That said, 39 should just be BPA. For whatever reason, I think one of a CB, edge, WR or TE who has 1st round value (especially in other years at edge/TE) will be there at 39. We still have plenty of holes to fill. CJ, Donte, YGM/?, Thielen, Chark and Hurst are all replaceable and/or not long term options so we shouldn’t pass over true BPA for any of them.

Have you seen the receivers that are projectedto be available? All small guys. That puts tight end, edge rusher at better value imo. 

Corner backs can be found in later rounds.  Edge rushers, good ones that contribute sooner rather than later, won't be available after round 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

Have you seen the receivers that are projectedto be available? All small guys. That puts tight end, edge rusher at better value imo. 

Corner backs can be found in later rounds.  Edge rushers, good ones that contribute sooner rather than later, won't be available after round 2. 

That’s not what I meant about the WRs. Remember when we drafted DJ? We were worried DJ or Ridley wouldn’t make it to us and they were both available. Same with Burns at 16, no way he gets to us. The top WRs this year aren’t close to the guys who’ve been going top 10/15 the past few years. I could easily see one or more of the WRs assumed to go in the first drop to 39. That could happen easily if we get say a TE run and more go 1st round that mocked.

We hosted JPJ for a visit. There are always more people mocked for the first round than there are actual first round picks so we’ll have to wait and see who actually falls to 39. I still agree that edge or TE would be my vote because I think we could get guys who in a vacuum would be ranked much higher in normal TE/edge years rather than reach at WR/CB this year to get one that next year would be a later 2nd pick. DJ was still a good pick for us even though it was a weak WR class because we got the first WR in the 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Give me the pass rusher early get a WR with similar skills in the 3rd or 4th round..

I thought that way until three weeks ago, that CB issue........love to have this happen- QB-BPA{EDGE/TE/WR/CB/LB/DL)-""-""

my recent mock that no ones cares about-

225537477_Screenshot2023-04-072_10_35PM.thumb.png.6b95281300e5611fc8875752dd919a3e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...