Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OFFICIAL: Bryce Young cancels remaining team visits


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I like the pick, but man I am torn. Going to be interested to follow both thier careers, I think they both will be good.

I’m just glad we are getting 1 of the big 3. I preferred Stroud, but was nervous about passing on Young. He seems to have that “it” factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

Most of the Young supporters were fine with the other QB's.  It was the Stroud Boys size queens who made post after negative post on Young. 

At one point one said that Stroud had no negatives and that's when I called BS and started harping on his pressured play, which was one of the worst in college football.

If we do take Stroud, I'm all in.

But at this point, that doesn't seem likely.

This is simply wrong, most Stroud supporters have concerns over Young’s size, and easily admitted Stroud was not perfect. Most are also fine with Young. You are highlighting maybe 1-2 individuals. And there has been tons of negatives from the Young crowd about Stroud as well, so I would recommend getting of that high horse of yours.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Talking to the wrong guy my man.

 

I never had a favorite. I was fine with Young/Stroud/AR.

 

I just thought based off film Young had the better tape than the other QB's. Im confident he will be the right guy. Throw size out the window. This kid has the "it factor".

It is interesting for someone being fine with any choice that you have been leading the charge on being divisive on the board with your “I guess you will no longer be a fan of the team if we pick Young” stuff. I hope you can move past that at some point. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you do realize at some point the mods are going to start cracking down on this type of poo posting.  Because we prefer the other guy doesnt mean we arent fans.  I hope bryce does well and makes me eat crow year after year (which I will gladly do) but I know how this game is played all too well

Sad Happy Hour GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

Many mocks still predicting Stroud.  Houston is Young or burst.  I would so love to trade #1 pick and get extra 1st in return.  Houston won’t be drafting top 5 next year and they know it.  Houston in a shitty position right now if we do indeed drafting Young.

Cope! Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...