Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Say..the S2 scores that were leaked aren't accurate


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We are picking Young.  And when that pick comes in, please start a thread about the new team you are going to root for, because I doubt people want to deal with you every time our QB gets hit or has a turnover over the next decade.  Your obsession with name-calling and Young bashing is borderline.  Perhaps we will understand more when Netflix completes their documentary on you.

 

The fug are you talking about..you seriously need to get off my sack bruh.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I don't even know what to believe anymore. It's lying season. 

Those scores could have been leaked so he could fall to a team outside the top 10.

They could be legit but the S2 owner is doing damage control for a potential top 2 pick who took a massive hit after doing poorly on their cognitive test so other future players will pay to take it next season. 

All I know is we're taking Young at 1 and all your attempts at saying we're taking Stroud are futile. 

Did I mention any of the above in the op or did I just open a thread to inform about misleading reports...I swear yall be reaching too hard

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

He didn't say that the 18% wasn't accurate....if anything he just damned CJ even more, because that 18% score came when he was tired, hungry, didn't want to do it, late at night, a bunch of other excuses. How will CJ be able to process information during the 4th quarter of a night game? I don't know, but it still seems very bad for CJ. This coming from a CJ fan and would have been happy if he was the pick.

 

Also what is "significantly higher the second time" from 18%? I mean 52% is significantly higher.

Its obvious he's talking about STROUD with this. Otherwise he wouldn't care because the entire S2 controversy has been in the context of Stroud plummeting on draft boards.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

S2 guy: “The LIST of scores that I have seen, TWO of the those scores are not accurate…somebody could have gotten a list of very early scores…one of the athletes on that particular list I know had a difficult time making his way to the all star game.”

2023 East-West Shrine Bowl QBs (college football’s “all-star game”):

Tanner Morgan, Aidan O’Connell, Tim DeMorat, Dorian Thompson-Robinson, Tommy DeVito, Chase Brice

NO CJ Stroud.

So, TWO inaccurate scores, the only one he gives any hint on who it is is NOT CJ Stroud. He mentions the LIST of scores HE has seen. We don’t know what that list is. The list of scores from McGinn’s article does not include any of those players at the east-west shrine game 

Goat boy: “Final Say…the S2 scores that were leaked aren’t accurate”

He thinks you’re too dumb to actually listen to what is said.

There have been few in huddle history who have deserved to have their thread making privileges revoked as much as this guy.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WUnderhill said:

S2 guy: “The LIST of scores that I have seen, TWO of the those scores are not accurate…somebody could have gotten a list of very early scores…one of the athletes on that particular list I know had a difficult time making his way to the all star game.”

2023 East-West Shrine Bowl QBs (college football’s “all-star game”):

Tanner Morgan, Aidan O’Connell, Tim DeMorat, Dorian Thompson-Robinson, Tommy DeVito, Chase Brice

NO CJ Stroud.

So, TWO inaccurate scores, the only one he gives any hint on who it is is NOT CJ Stroud. He mentions the LIST of scores HE has seen. We don’t know what that list is. The list of scores from McGinn’s article does not include any of those players at the east-west shrine game 

Goat boy: “Final Say…the S2 scores that were leaked aren’t accurate”

He thinks you’re too dumb to actually listen to what is said.

There have been few in huddle history who have deserved to have their thread making privileges revoked as much as this guy.

Again I mentioned no name so take it as you will. Idc tbh if this thread isn't for you there are plenty for you to contribute. Have a good day

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

S2 guy: “The LIST of scores that I have seen, TWO of the those scores are not accurate…somebody could have gotten a list of very early scores…one of the athletes on that particular list I know had a difficult time making his way to the all star game.”

2023 East-West Shrine Bowl QBs (college football’s “all-star game”):

Tanner Morgan, Aidan O’Connell, Tim DeMorat, Dorian Thompson-Robinson, Tommy DeVito, Chase Brice

NO CJ Stroud.

So, TWO inaccurate scores, the only one he gives any hint on who it is is NOT CJ Stroud. He mentions the LIST of scores HE has seen. We don’t know what that list is. The list of scores from McGinn’s article does not include any of those players at the east-west shrine game 

Goat boy: “Final Say…the S2 scores that were leaked aren’t accurate”

He thinks you’re too dumb to actually listen to what is said.

There have been few in huddle history who have deserved to have their thread making privileges revoked as much as this guy.

Isnt Senior Bowl also an allstar game?

Hendon Hooker with 46% attended that one. He seems to have climbed during the draft process, but with that score, my guess, he wouldn't. So that might be his old score...

My speculation.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kass said:

Isnt Senior Bowl also an allstar game?

Hendon Hooker with 46% attended that one. He seems to have climbed during the draft process, but with that score, my guess, he wouldn't. So that might be his old score...

My speculation.

 

 

Good point, he could mean the senior bowl. So yeah in that case he is likely referencing Hooker. People should find it strange he finds a way to explain Hooker’s score but not Stroud’s.

The guy affirms in the interview that they don’t want the scores to be used against the QBs. He’s telling you he has motives to keep it all rainbows and sunshine to your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

He didn't say that the 18% wasn't accurate....if anything he just damned CJ even more, because that 18% score came when he was tired, hungry, didn't want to do it, late at night, a bunch of other excuses. How will CJ be able to process information during the 4th quarter of a night game? I don't know, but it still seems very bad for CJ. This coming from a CJ fan and would have been happy if he was the pick.

 

Also what is "significantly higher the second time" from 18%? I mean 52% is significantly higher.

He said that player was at an all star game. That wasn’t CJ. Reaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Don't get yourself worked up and bothered BY stans..just a piece to inform you can't believe everything you see

 

The "context" story is most likely about Hendon Hooker (possibly Clayton Tune). To my knowledge CJ Stroud (as well as B. Young, W. Levis, A. Richardson) didn't take part in an All-Star game this season.

As far as the 2nd guy? I didn't get enough clues, but probability would suggest Stroud as he would be the biggest outlier on the leaked list ... possibly AR. I doubt any of the 90's scores are the incorrect ones since he made a point to talk about context and re-testing.

The leaked list I assume is being used: 

 

 

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...