Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So let’s talk about Levis


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, OldhamA said:

It's an honest post.

He didn't clear my minimum height / weight requirements for the position. 

Clearly he cleared Fitterer's and Reich's, which is all that ultimately matters.

can you share your scorecard with us since it is a talking point here? or Did you already post it?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It honestly won't be surprising to see Hooker go ahead of him at this point.

 

He’s got a lot of 1-read tape and is 25. I wouldn’t be shocked but it would be a small surprise to see him be next off the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

What's this even mean?

They all came in at the backhalf of their first seasons. 2 of the 3 it was the plan from the get go. Let them sit for the first half of the season to get a feel for the game and then give them a chance on the back end of the season to get some game action. 

 

Will Levis has already played in pro systems, so he wont need a year to learn the sytem before seeing game time. He is not "raw." Whoever drafts Levis, will play levis this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

They all came in at the backhalf of their first seasons. 2 of the 3 it was the plan from the get go. Let them sit for the first half of the season to get a feel for the game and then give them a chance on the back end of the season to get some game action. 

 

Will Levis has already played in pro systems, so he wont need a year to learn the sytem before seeing game time. He is not "raw." Whoever drafts Levis, will play levis this year.

Not Baker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...