Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential $1.2B Panthers stadium renovation discussion


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't see how they're gonna spend the equivalent of damn near top dollar for a modern new stadium and NOT put a dome over BOA. There's gonna be serious fat involved in the project to line the appropriate pockets, but damn... you're still going to have to do some MAJOR work to justify 10 figures of spending on paper.

It's also to pay for a new practice facility, hopefully that eats up enough of the budget that we don't try to put a dome on the stadium. 

 

Some of my favorite games have come in the elements, and two of our division rivals are dome teams. The elements have played to our advantage vs teams like the saints on several occasions, most memorably the monsoon game in 2013 which is one of my all time favorite games I've ever attended (and I've been to every home game since that season and many many prior). 

 

Football is a game meant for the outdoors, and the elements make it even more fun for me and more difficult for our opponents. Keep the stadium open air!

Edited by Purrnicious
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Pantherzilla91 said:

What an ignorant post 

Based on your stance here and past remarks blasting anyone not showing 100% unflinching positivity toward the team I'm guessing you take the sycophant approach to billionaire owners.

John Oliver Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope this doesn't go anything at all like the fiasco that was the new state of the art practice facility. Which btw it would be very nice to have one of those right about now for this new staff and roster after all we gave up for the opportunity to select first overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Smithers said:

For reference, the recently announced new Titans stadium is 2.1B.  A renovation cost this high must include something extravagant.  

The devil is in the details with these stadium deals. This will be done Teppers way and who knows what that will be. He strikes me as someone who would want something to make Jerry Jones jealous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

Have you seen the cost of materials and labor in the construction industry lately?! A new stadium like Jerry World would cost over $3B today.  I would have to see the details of this "renovation" being proposed before I have an educated opinion on this venture.  

Yeah.

The number is still absurd for a renovation. And likely why it's being pushed for now. Get those numbers locked in before a likely recession drives down the ultimate cost and cash in on the good will of our shiny new #1 overall QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah.

The number is still absurd for a renovation. And likely why it's being pushed for now. Get those numbers locked in before a likely recession drives down the ultimate cost and cash in on the good will of our shiny new #1 overall QB.

I'm not sure anyone wins if a recession hits. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

*NO INSIDER INFO ON THIS TOPIC*
 

However I did want to clear up misconceptions like this one. City/County Governments have entertainment and tourism budgets earmarked specifically for projects like these. They CANNOT use that money for things such as schools or other infrastructures. It is a completely different pool of resources and does not impact in any way the other budgets

Finally, a voice of wisdom!!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure anyone wins if a recession hits. 

The wealthy elite ALWAYS win in economic downturns. That's when they can further concentrate wealth and holding just now at a sweet discount!

A David Tepper could lose 99.9% of his net worth and STILL be a multimillionaire.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

City of Charlotte is ran by idiots.  They should have got ahead of this 4 or 5 years ago and it would have cost half.  They should know more than anyone that property and construction doesn't deppreciate.  Sadly 1.2billion is a deal right now in the world of NFL stadiums.  Absolutely idiotic leadership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

*NO INSIDER INFO ON THIS TOPIC*
 

However I did want to clear up misconceptions like this one. City/County Governments have entertainment and tourism budgets earmarked specifically for projects like these. They CANNOT use that money for things such as schools or other infrastructures. It is a completely different pool of resources and does not impact in any way the other budgets

 

34 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Spot on.  I work in local govt mgmt - tourism dollars are governed by state law.  Occupancy tax revenues (likely in the hundreds of millions in Charlotte) come from taxes on hotel stays.  That money can only be spent on tourist and entertainment related expenses that put “heads in beds.”  

Thanks for the correction guys.

That said, the state using tax dollars to fund a single man's business renovation while he pockets all the profits is even worse. That poo ain't right no matter which way you look at it. Taking it a step further, should the state, city, and/or county use tax money to pay for renovations at every restaurant, hotel, and store that tourists visit too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...