Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Anti-tankers…. Never forget!!!!


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Varking said:

I agree. It worked out for both organizations. I was just pointing that recent example out for those claiming tanking never happens. And without needing to say it the Colts did it by hiring a coach who has never coached at any level before… They were clearly just hoping to remain in the running for a top pick. 

It's funny that the two examples in recent memory of alleged tanking both resulted in the head coach losing his job.  And yet fans wonder why teams don't tank more often lol.  You're basically expecting the guy in charge to throw his job (and potentially career) away in the interest of a franchise that is going to get rid of him at the end of the year.  It's counter-intuitive.

Let's see if the Colts "tanking" works out for them.  Imagine if Reich is successful here, and Steichen/Richardson are colossal failures in Indianapolis.  That'll be a huge cautionary tale for the pro-tanking crowd.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

I’m starting to realize that this fan base is built on moral victories. Good thread, OP

like beating Tampa in a meaningless game last season would have set this franchise back at least another 3 seasons

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

I’m starting to realize that this fan base is built on moral victories. Good thread, OP

all the arguments that have been said against this whole silly tank idea and that's what you are coming back to? 

Cary Elwes Eye Roll GIF

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

all the arguments that have been said against this whole silly tank idea and that's what you are coming back to? 

Cary Elwes Eye Roll GIF

It's obvious some people just are not capable of nuanced thinking. It has to be black or white, yes or no, or else they just can't comprehend the concept.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's got nothing to do with moral  victories or any of that poo. It's about not being narrow minded and doing more harm than good to the team and the game and costing people jobs and possibly getting in a ton of trouble.

Not to mention it's just a weak strategy...and by weak I mean its implemented by weak people/teams who deserve to lose and create a culture of losing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

It's funny that the two examples in recent memory of alleged tanking both resulted in the head coach losing his job.  And yet fans wonder why teams don't tank more often lol.  You're basically expecting the guy in charge to throw his job (and potentially career) away in the interest of a franchise that is going to get rid of him at the end of the year.  It's counter-intuitive.

Let's see if the Colts "tanking" works out for them.  Imagine if Reich is successful here, and Steichen/Richardson are colossal failures in Indianapolis.  That'll be a huge cautionary tale for the pro-tanking crowd.

It worked out for the Eagles and the Jags. Eagles tanked, the Jags have their coach now and went to the playoffs with him. Eagles new coach lead the team to a Super Bowl run. Indy is TBD but they are becoming a poorly run organization that elite QB play can’t cover up anymore. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rayzor said:

i can just imagine the meetings where teams tell their coaches and players that they have to lose games.

"seriously, guys, it's for the good of the team! THINK ABOUT THE DRAFT!!!!!"

i just can't get over how stupid a concept this is, especially in trying to make it happen.

telling the coaches, "you know...just don't put in the best players. say you are putting in players to evaluate. no one will know." "you don't want us to win?" "think of the draft!" "but won't my job be in jeopardy if i lose?" "think of the draft!"

or telling players to take it easy or that valuable players will all of a sudden be benched...for what? so we can draft their replacement? 

you may think t helps the long term picture by getting a better draft spot, but culturally that kind of poo is a killer. it tears down morale and it will keep free agents away who want to win. and it will keep new coaches who want to be part of a winning culture away from your team.

and if a coach gets fired for losing even if he was told by the FO to do it, lawsuits coming.

Bro… the eagles did this just a couple of years ago and their coach got fired with no lawsuit coming.  Benching Jalen for their third string QB in the finale and pulling starters during the game. They went to the Super Bowl this past year. There was no long term lingering effect for doing it. 
 

players typically claim stuff like this would make them never play for an organization but guess what? Players sign there anyways because of $$$ and due to the salary cap not all the best run teams can afford the best players. 
 

Poor organizations like the Browns haven’t had trouble signing free agents. Guys usually just go to the highest bidder. 
 

But I’d you’re trying to be dramatic saying teams are telling the players they are tanking that’s not how it’s being done. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im an anti tanker but I feel like management possibly tried to sneaky tank last season and it didnt work out. I believe they fired Rhule who they knew was garbage after the first couple games (took long enough) and replaced him with Wilks who they thought would stink it up worse and send us into the depths of the NFL. Turns out Wilks is a thousand times the coach that Rhule ever was or will be in the NFL and it backfired on them. Had they kept our bumbling idiot as head coach we probably would have finished much worse. To top that off with our QB carousel of crap I felt like they knew we struck turd and were ready to be led there by bad coaching and turd QB'ing. The shockers were Darnold looked better with Wilks and Wilks being a good guy got the players motivated. 

I think plans became to tank but management made moves that accidentally made us gel a little better like showing Rhule the door and Wilks making Darnold look much better.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Panthera onca said:

It's obvious some people just are not capable of nuanced thinking. It has to be black or white, yes or no, or else they just can't comprehend the concept.

Please explain in nuanced detail why limping into the playoffs with a shitty QB and mediocre coach would put this team in a good position for the future as opposed to drafting high and therefore starting afresh with a better coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Please explain in nuanced detail why limping into the playoffs with a shitty QB and mediocre coach would put this team in a good position for the future as opposed to drafting high and therefore starting afresh with a better coaching staff.

It has been explained ad nauseum in this thread. Either you didn’t read the thread or, dare I say, can’t understand a nuanced discussion?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

It has been explained ad nauseum in this thread. Either you didn’t read the thread or, dare I say, can’t understand a nuanced discussion?

It’s the same old responses as before. People think “pro-tankers” expect players and coaches to fail on purpose.  We know tanking is done at the FO level. 
 

JR got us Cam by tanking and Tepper tried to tank for Bryce. I guess you can’t understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This article (ESPN) got me thinking and I think on paper.  Thought I would share.  This thinking involves realistic cap analysis, needs, the draft, and free agency.  I think it realistically addresses Edge and LB fairly well.  OL (not 2026 so much, but 2027 and beyond looks good).  The free agent S has deep range and coverage skills, something that killed us on third downs last year, imo.  Beyond Edge, LB, S, and OL depth, that is about it.  I took a flyer on DT and WR depth late in the draft, but at CB (Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, and Thornton), QB, RB, TE, etc. we are going to rely on undrafted free agents.  No cap room left. EDGE:  In the $7m per year range, the edge from Atlanta Ebiketie got pressure at a high rate in reduced snaps. With Atlanta adding 2 edge rushers as rookies who seemed to do well (Pearce is one of them--*) but he got pressure in limited snaps at a high rate 16.9% (one in eight pass rush).   He is 27 and played in 384 snaps.  PFF Score of 74.9.  had 2 sacks.  If he had a normal workload, based on his limited play, he would have had about 5 to 6 sacks and about 60 pressures.  However, it is likely he would be rotational here, logging about 500 snaps.   A lot of this decision depends on how we feel about Princely.  If they like his development, you probably do not draft an Edge in round 1 or maybe even 2 for several reasons (and many may disagree with this logic, but a good GM has long-term vision):  1. That would give you 3 Edge contracts to negotiate in 3-4 years.  2.  Edges take time to develop.  They would peak around 2028.  The Panthers are in "win now" mode, I think. Mafe (Seahawks, PFF 69.2) is another option, but he is more along the lines of Scourton and Jones II.  He would command a contract in the $10m range. Kwity Paye (Indianapolis, PFF 68.7) He is about 28 and is expected to sign a deal around $18m per season.  I am not that impressed, but he is considered "above average."  I'd rather have Ebiketie from Atlanta for $10m per season less. Center:  The center position in the draft is looking better.  There are some short armed OTs (like Parker, Duke, et al) who will project inside (G,C). Personally, I like the Center position in this draft--let Mays walk.  Re-sign Corbett, and draft a C in round 3.   Linebacker:  I am not sure what we should do here.   I think Morgan will fall in love with Cincinnati's Golday, and we would take him at #51.  Rodriguez (Texas Tech) in round 3 could be a steal.  However, I am not sure that I see value after Styles in round 1.  I think Devin Lloyd will want elite meny and he is not elite--he is good.  He will ask for $15m per season.  Leo Chenel (KC, 75.1 PFF, est. $5m) is a much better option. Safety:  I think Kam Curl would be a great fit here. (Rams, 2 Ints 87 tackles) he is very versatile. Expected to get between $10m and $12m per year, however.  In the draft, I think they like Bud Clark who should be there in round 4.  Are Moehrig, Ransom, and Simmons enough?  Tony Adams (63.7 PFF) a deep safety known for his range.  He is expected to get a 3-year, $20m deal on the market. Based on what I am seeing here and the way I am thinking right now on 2/21, here is what I might do: Free Agency CAP: I am going to assume we can clear about $50m by restructuring the contracts of Horn, Lewis, Hunt, and Brown and cutting AShawn Robinson.  We could (bold move) extend Ickey Ekwonu--considering his situation, it could be beneficial to him long term, and his guaranteed salary could be spread over the next 3 years or so. Re-sign veterans:  OL:  Corbett ($3m), Nijman ($4m), Christensen ($2.5m--2 years $5m), Jake Curhan ($1.4m-2 years, $3m).  BC may be ready around mid season, Curhan has experience at RT and G, and played well.  He has played LT in preseason.  There is NOTHING in free agency at LT--most sucked in 2025 and/or are old.  WR: Jalen Coker ($8m--4 years, $32m), LB: Rozeboom ($3.5--2 years, $7m) Cherelus ($1m)  ST: Isiah Simmons ($1.5m).  TOTAL:  Approx. $25m New Free Agents:  Linebacker:  Leo Chenal (KC, age 26) estimated $5m. Safety:  Tony Adams, (NYJ, age 27)  estimated $7m Edge: Arnold Ebikete (Atl, age 27)  estimated $7m Draft: Round 1:  Cashius Howell, Edge Texas AM (This pick gives the Panthers a situational edge rusher to pair with Princely while Ebikete and Scourton start.  Jones II could be cut to save about $4m in cap room. Round 2: Caleb Tiernan, LT, Northwestern (Good pass protector who needs work in run blocking.  I wanted Golday LB here, but if we sign Chenel, the need is lessened at LB if we re-sign Rozeboom. Tiernan is solid). Round 3:  Jake Slaughter C, Florida (Groom behind Corbett for a while, but Slaughter is an impressive C who should be ready by 2027). Round 4:  Demetrius Crownover, RT Texas AM (This guy can develop as a backup until Moton decides to leave) Round 5:  Aiden Fisher, ILB Indiana (could be a nice fit in this system.  Smart, with special teams ability)' Round 6: Ty Montgomery, WR John Carroll Univ.  (very productive with good size and hands.  a gamble, but worth a sixth) Round 7:  James Thompson Jr.  DT, Illinois (was a beast at the Shrine bowl practices and game.  For some reason, there have been a lot of undrafted free agents and day 3 DTs succeed in the NFL.  This could be one.)                          
    • thats the best picture they could come up with for him?
×
×
  • Create New...