Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers-Charlotte current stadium agreement ends.


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

So you're saying Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast? Shame on my geography teacher for telling me otherwise!

I Hate It Reaction GIF by Laff

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Meh, not really.  The NFL wouldn't suffer much if the Panthers left.

you say this but the data tells a different story... year over year Panthers are worth more to the NFL than the following teams when its comes to total revenue:

 

  • Detroit Lions - $452 million ($114 million)
  • Cincinnati Bengals - $462 million ($89 million)
  • Arizona Cardinals - $467 million ($112 million)
  • Buffalo Bills -  $470 million ($83 million)
  • Jacksonville Jaguars -  $471 million ($114 million)
  • Tennessee Titans - $481 million ($115 million)
  • Indianapolis Colts - $484 million ($100 million)
  • New Orleans Saints - $490 million ($125 million)
  • Los Angeles Chargers - $491 million ($156 million)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - $492 million ($62 million)
  • Pittsburgh Steelers - $494 million ($135 million)
  • Kansas City Chiefs - $495 million ($135 million)
  • Minnesota Vikings - $500 million ($141 million)
  • Carolina Panthers - $501 million ($139 million)

What this tells us is that the Charlotte market is a very healthy Market for the NFL. They would not want to risk any transition revenue. When the Chargers and Rams moved from their original locations the NFL lost money. NFL isnt in the business to lose money.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

facts GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

facts GIF

 

39 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Hmmm!!! According to that chart Charlotte is bigger than Atlanta and we all know it's a better place to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

There isn't enough talent for 40 teams, hell it's diluted enough as is. 

 

That was my first thought as well. Although the talent has increased here lately. It still is no where near deep enough for 40 teams. And that isn't even factoring in the QB position. Just ain't gon happen cappen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

ATL is on Par with Raleigh for population, and only a little above Fayetteville, Charlotte dwarfs ATL It was a terrible argument, maybe educate yourself before spewing nonsense @CamWhoaaCam

Hai Guys Charlotte is over 2x the size of ATL with 2x the population but its just a mini ATL. Lol. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, neverlosethefeeling said:

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Didnt you know those people outside the metro area arent allowed to commute?

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...