Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers-Charlotte current stadium agreement ends.


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

So you're saying Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast? Shame on my geography teacher for telling me otherwise!

I Hate It Reaction GIF by Laff

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Meh, not really.  The NFL wouldn't suffer much if the Panthers left.

you say this but the data tells a different story... year over year Panthers are worth more to the NFL than the following teams when its comes to total revenue:

 

  • Detroit Lions - $452 million ($114 million)
  • Cincinnati Bengals - $462 million ($89 million)
  • Arizona Cardinals - $467 million ($112 million)
  • Buffalo Bills -  $470 million ($83 million)
  • Jacksonville Jaguars -  $471 million ($114 million)
  • Tennessee Titans - $481 million ($115 million)
  • Indianapolis Colts - $484 million ($100 million)
  • New Orleans Saints - $490 million ($125 million)
  • Los Angeles Chargers - $491 million ($156 million)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - $492 million ($62 million)
  • Pittsburgh Steelers - $494 million ($135 million)
  • Kansas City Chiefs - $495 million ($135 million)
  • Minnesota Vikings - $500 million ($141 million)
  • Carolina Panthers - $501 million ($139 million)

What this tells us is that the Charlotte market is a very healthy Market for the NFL. They would not want to risk any transition revenue. When the Chargers and Rams moved from their original locations the NFL lost money. NFL isnt in the business to lose money.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

facts GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

facts GIF

 

39 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Hmmm!!! According to that chart Charlotte is bigger than Atlanta and we all know it's a better place to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

There isn't enough talent for 40 teams, hell it's diluted enough as is. 

 

That was my first thought as well. Although the talent has increased here lately. It still is no where near deep enough for 40 teams. And that isn't even factoring in the QB position. Just ain't gon happen cappen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

ATL is on Par with Raleigh for population, and only a little above Fayetteville, Charlotte dwarfs ATL It was a terrible argument, maybe educate yourself before spewing nonsense @CamWhoaaCam

Hai Guys Charlotte is over 2x the size of ATL with 2x the population but its just a mini ATL. Lol. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, neverlosethefeeling said:

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Didnt you know those people outside the metro area arent allowed to commute?

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...