Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor - Canes Adding Tarasenko

MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

What if they traded Drury and Pesce for EK. I've heard that SJ is willing to go over 20% now on retention. (Been the hold up on ek deals) 35% or so now, add a second team at 20% and give up some picks and prospects.  Canes have had this Tank deal on the table since day 1.

That could work if they get the retention to 55%, that’s probably where it needs to be. And then we send out Pesce and Drury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

 

Bunting - Aho - Tarasenko

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Teravainen - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Martinook - Jarvis

Drury

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

Agree on everyone/thing but Noesen. I think he’s QB for 4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

I get confused with the 4th line. Ive always known it to be for upcomers and older vets, but for us we put someone like Jarvis there who is a top 6. Wouldnt putting a top6 guy on the 4th usually mean a disgruntled player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I get confused with the 4th line. Ive always known it to be for upcomers and older vets, but for us we put someone like Jarvis there who is a top 6. Wouldnt putting a top6 guy on the 4th usually mean a disgruntled player?

You're right in that moving Jarvy to the 4 is kind of a gut punch. But, there's not much room to slot him in anywhere unless Turbo gets moved. Even then, someone might have to play on their off-side.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...