Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defective, shabby fountain spews new and old horseflop


UnluckyforSome
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, UnluckyforSome said:

I would say we aren't giving him life. He is still working as a coach. To your point, no one really talks about Seifert anymore.

Despite the time difference, Seifert and Rhule were two different types of awful. Seifert at least had an arc in 1999/2000 before collapsing in 01 while Rhule was a systemic failure due to incompetence.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Despite the time difference, Seifert and Rhule were two different types of awful. Seifert at least had an arc in 1999/2000 before collapsing in 01 while Rhule was a systemic failure due to incompetence.

Seifert has an established pedigree and came from one of the greatest FB brains and systems of all time. That alone bails him out. 
 

Ruhle is the worst coach in team history, followed by Perry Fewell. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has a shelf life, and if he does great it extends.

If Reich and the all star cast fail, it extends. Big time, then. I mean, just look at who they brought in that couldn't do any better.... 

Even if the Panthers win, it is with his players. Need him to flame out in huskerville, then that is who he talks about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

Seifert has an established pedigree and came from one of the greatest FB brains and systems of all time. That alone bails him out. 
 

Ruhle is the worst coach in team history, followed by Perry Fewell. 

Well I think I brought Seifert into the conversation to illustrate that we never talk about him anymore, because he is no longer working as a coach. The only comparison that I think is fair between the 2 is that they are both former coaches here, and were not successful.

 

The idea of giving life to Rhule is a little off-base, especially when it's taken into account that he, not us, continues to bring his failure up, and how it's not his fault. He wants to make sure anyone listening is 100% aware of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Snuck in a litle Covid excuse in there, nice. We actually looked better in 2020 than early 22 when Covid wasn't a hinderance to the teams any longer

Rhule's best game as a offensive coach was probably the first game, against the raiders I think.  But the offense got worse as he coached them up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...