Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Belichick and Brady take Jabs at Gamble


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

:coolgleamA:

Talking about Harris and Gamble

Everyone takes liberty to say whatever they want to say in a situation like [sunday]," Brady told WEEI. "I've seen plenty of plays made on Chris Gamble, too, over the course of the season."

My response would be that's a lot of conversation coming from a team that lost another game," Belichick said.

other than these two guys from Carolina after they lost another game. I guess they don't think that way. They haven't won a lot of games now."

http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nfl/news/story?id=4740924

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had a QB that could complete more than half their passes, we would have won yesterday.

Moore outplayed Brady and we still lost.

pretty pathetic when you factor in winning the T.O. thing too.

Fox lost that game when he gave up the field position game and let Kasay kick a low% FG in the rain, changed game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accusing the opposition of quitting when you WIN a game is one thing. Accusing the oppostion of quitting when you LOSE the game is embarrasing.

100% agree with you ^^^^

To me, its as if Harris and Gamble took a passive aggressive approach in saying, "Hey, it wasn't our fault we lost".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope PTI and ATH talk about it today. I hope Gamble and Harris never answer questions like that again after a loss. When you let Welker OWN you, you need to tuck your tail between your legs and walk your ass back to Charlotte. Big deal, you caused Moss to slow up. Guess who you didn't stop? That's right, everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm cuious of what questions were asked of Harris and Gamble for these comments to be made. I highly doubt that they were standing at their lockers proclaiming that they beat Moss into submission and he decided to give up and quit. I'm sure a reporter from the Globe asked them what they thought of Moss' play, and they told the truth. I guess they shouldn't have said anything, but ESPN was all over the comments on Sportscenter last night.

Gamble must be a horrible speaker, because Berman couldn't quote him without constantly tripping on his words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agree with you ^^^^

To me, its as if Harris and Gamble took a passive aggressive approach in saying, "Hey, it wasn't our fault we lost".

This was my thought... Gamble was basically saying "I did my job..." and he did, with shutting down Moss and the INT... but we still lost and the comments make the Panthers look kinda stupid.

The problem with the Pats is that you have to shut down Moss AND Welker... letting them run all over us didn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...