Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Jets at Panthers Game Day Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Icky wasn't good against speed last season at all. Hopefully it changes for this season. 

Dude, a reasonable person. Can we be friends? Any time I say anything remotely realistic about Ickey I get flamed here. He gets beat far, far too often to get the praise that he does as a blindside tackle. I get that the ability is there, and it shows up sometimes, but man did he look rough yesterday. 

I'm also beginning to think that bryce's success in camp is as related to the Panthers defense being Swiss cheese as it is him being as good as advertised. I think he has a shot to be great, even this year, but if Ickey doesn't get his poo together Bryce will get hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, therealmjl said:

The Chiefs look abysmal against the Saints right now

The reigning SB champs lost on a last second FG and put up 24 points without their starting O on the field and they look abysmal.

Panthers put their starting O on the field and got shut out, but don't worry, it's only preseason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

The reigning SB champs lost on a last second FG and put up 24 points without their starting O on the field and they look abysmal.

Panthers put their starting O on the field and got shut out, but don't worry, it's only preseason!

Lol you really took the time to bump that? Context and timestamps are important.
 

Since we are going there the Chiefs did put their starting O on the field and they sucked, btw.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Lol you really took the time to bump that? Context and timestamps are important.
 

Since we are going there the Chiefs did put their starting O on the field and they sucked, btw.

Lol... I used your quote as a reference to those who claim the Panthers will be just fine, this is a preseason game, no worries, etc.

But yeah, what's your assessment of the Panthers after yesterday? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Lol... I used your quote as a reference to those who claim the Panthers will be just fine, this is a preseason game, no worries, etc.

But yeah, what's your assessment of the Panthers after yesterday? 

They looked terrible. Ready for Friday so I can wipe my memory clean of it. I expect they will look a lot better.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Lol... I used your quote as a reference to those who claim the Panthers will be just fine, this is a preseason game, no worries, etc.

But yeah, what's your assessment of the Panthers after yesterday? 

How about the Dolphins? Should their fans be concerned after their bad preseason game? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...