Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting QB


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

I love how people just assume you can pick and choose which draft you will have the ability to choose a franchise QB.

The last 4 drafts have produced 15 QBs that will start week one. So getting a possible franchise QB happens in nearly every draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'll just take a moment here to say damn that touchdown pass to Theilen looked good 😁

I can't wait to see the offense they plan to run. This vanilla crap is tough to watch them try to get open so that Bryce has someone to throw to.  The running game should help with that.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scratched said:

The last 4 drafts have produced 15 QBs that will start week one. So getting a possible franchise QB happens in nearly every draft. 

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

He's both.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

I clearly stated getting a POSSIBLE franchise QB. Why do we need the #1 pick to get a franchise QB? Maybe you are the ignorant one? 

Edited by scratched
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, scratched said:

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

We got our franchise QB.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2023 at 11:28 AM, Jmac said:

Once they get the Oline fixed and if the WR Corp can stay on their feet....then yes, he is the right guy.

I agree.  The biggest problem I see is the offense line.  Even a GOAT cannot perform if he doesn’t have the time.

 

Edited by Green-Ghost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Are they all franchise QBs? I assume you must be in the crowd of thinking that just because of outliers like Tom Brady you can just get a franchise QB whenever you please. Brock Purdy is in that list of QBs you mentioned. I suppose we can just make Mr. Irrelevant a good QB whenever we want because that’s definitely how things work. It’s so easy to get QBs up and down the draft, how’s Corral working out? Will Grier? Tony Pike? Jimmy Clausen? Do we need to keep going?

No, what you were talking about is trying to get Maye or Williams, as if we could just hire a HC and attract a decent staff and ask them to tank. Or do you believe it’s every year the team picking #1 with a legit #1 QB available would trade the pick? You’re either a troll or just ignorant.

You may have to throw Will Grier out here as he looked pretty good and pretty developed last night. Night and day to where he was. It takes a special person to make a starting NFL QB and then even more special to be good at it but unfortunately we have not had good coaching to develop a QB and looks like Grier could be one who slipped through the cracks because of piss poor unskilled coaching that could not develop anything or anyone pertaining to an NFL team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2023 at 1:19 PM, scratched said:

And for the record.... I've not once said I didn't like Bryce, or didn't think he could be our franchise QB. In my opinion I thought we should have kept DJ, traded down in the draft to acquire more picks. With those picks we could have gotten a few possible starters and built depth. Then we go after our franchise QB. 

Or we could have traded down and drafted a bunch of crap. How many late round guys have we hit on? 

https://www.panthers.com/history/draft

Look at this since Rhule was here, we have hit on our 1st guy I guess and only really one 2nd rounder in Chinn, the rest are jags. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

You may have to throw Will Grier out here as he looked pretty good and pretty developed last night. Night and day to where he was. It takes a special person to make a starting NFL QB and then even more special to be good at it but unfortunately we have not had good coaching to develop a QB and looks like Grier could be one who slipped through the cracks because of piss poor unskilled coaching that could not develop anything or anyone pertaining to an NFL team. 

He was playing against nobodies, Grier is a journeyman, not a franchise QB. He played a full game against one of the worst teams in the league, it was also the guys that are going to be cut from said shitty team, running vanilla plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...