Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Status of Rhule era draft picks


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

i refelt something towards the end of last year. Felt like the late 2004 run. So we at 2005 now gonna make the nfc championship. 

What I saw was a reminder of how far this team has fallen, again.  This team needed a staff and roster purge. The only question was when and how far was Tepper willing to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I tried to be. Lasted a couple weeks.

I forced enthusiasm and I think a lot did. We were desperate for something good.

I haven't had to force any enthusiasm this year.

Pretty similar to me. I was never a big fan of hiring a college coach but I did what I could to be positive.

My first real "uh oh" moment was when Tepper and Marty were telling the story about his interview. Couldn't help but think it sounded like a couple of senior citizens describing how smart the young man who sold them their new insurance policy sounded. When the info about him having total control hit, that was another "grin and stay positive" moment, but the unease was still there.

Of course, the start of season two made it look like it was actually going to work though. Everybody was excited, until we hit mid-season and realized it all just been an illusion.

The Rhule era (If a three year period can be called that) was a heck of a rollercoaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

This was a question someone asked in the cut thread. Thought I'd go ahead and post the table here.

2020

1 (7) DT Derrick Brown
2 (38) DE Yetur Gross-Matos
2 (64) S/LB Jeremy Chinn

----------

4 (113) CB Troy Pride Jr
5 (152) S Kenny Robinson
6 (184) DT Bravvion Roy
7 (221) CB Stantley Thomas-Oliver III *

2021

1 (8) CB Jaycee Horn
2 (59) WR Terrace Marshall Jr
3 (70) T Brady Christensen
3 (83) TE Tommy Tremble
4 (126) RB Chuba Hubbard

----------

5 (158) DT Daviyon Nixon
5 (166) CB Keith Taylor
6 (193) G Deonte Brown *
6 (204) WR Shi Smith *
6 (222) LS Thomas Fletcher    
7 (232) DT Phil Hoskins

2022

1 (6) T Ickey Ekwonu
3 (94) QB Matt Corral
6 (189) DE Amaré Barno
6 (199) OL Cade Mays    

----------

4 (120) LB Brandon Smith *    
7 (242) CB Kalon Barnes

...

Still fluid of course, but that's where we stand at the moment. The guys with asterisks could potentially be brought back to the practice squad.

Comparing notes...

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Sounds like an upgrade over hurney considering we're still hitting on Round 1 and making some good picks sometimes on round 2 and 3 unlike Hurney which was no picks outside of round 1 ever lol

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncguy2184 said:

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

 

I mean pre lockout talk Hurney was a pretty good GM.   Then lockout window hit and I think Jerry was a big part in us going sideways, dumb contracts, etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncguy2184 said:

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

Marty sometimes found a good players. He also all too frequently found mediocre to bad ones.

Ultimately, if you want to accurately judge a GM, you pretty much have to look at the whole roster.

Marty just didn't build winning teams, even when he had cornerstone guys like Newton and Kuechly to build around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThPantherFan said:

At the least.  Lot of ?s.

If they get lucky in the draft, and find better depth in the next offseason, and most of all stay healthy, I could see them making some noise in the playoffs.  But thats a lot of it's that have to go their way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person's post cutdown thoughts...

Rough day for Matt Rhule guys

Rhule had a big say in personnel during his three seasons in Carolina. But Reich and the new staff said goodbye to five of the draft picks from Rhule’s tenure. All were third-day picks: receiver Shi Smith, cornerbacks Keith Taylor and Stantley Thomas-Oliver, linebacker Brandon Smith and offensive lineman Deonte Brown, who was waived at roster cutdowns for the second year in a row.

Brandon Smith was the highest draft pick among Tuesday’s casualties. The Panthers took Smith in the fourth round from Rhule’s Penn State alma mater despite very little college production. Smith, Taylor and Brown were part of an 11-player class in 2021. Six of the seven players chosen on the third day that year are gone, with running back Chuba Hubbard (fourth round) the lone man standing.

Thomas-Oliver’s exit means only three players remain from the all-defensive draft class brought in by Rhule and Marty Hurney in 2020 shortly after Rhule was hired: first-round pick Derrick Brown and second-rounders Yetur Gross-Matos and Chinn.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a little sunny to say all the bad picks were Matt rhule or Matt rhule’s philosophy

fitterer has talked pretty glowingly about his affinity for drafting guys who are high traits and allowing the coaches to develop them, and the most recent draft had more than one guy who fit the mold of big athletic profile who wasn’t a major collegiate producer 

its not really that scandalous to wiff on most of your day 3 picks anyways and if you’re going to be taking a chance you’d rather do it on guys with big athletic profiles

Ideally a more veteran nfl staff can draw out these athletic traits, but they’re definitely not going to stop keying in on athleticism as an extremely important scouting metric

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...