Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

I think Duke is pretty good.  9 wins last year and return a lot. 

I think Clemson just lacks a working pass game.  I  think they got the rest to be really good.  Which has plagued them the last 2 years.   They got to get rid of this short screen WR game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

Clemson is on the road in week 1 against a Duke team that went 9-4 last year returning the vast majority of it's starters alongside a very disciplined and well coached defense under Elko. Clemson also has a new OC and inexperienced QB at the helm. I honestly don't know what a lot of people expected.  I mean we're basically doing everything an underdog shouldn't do to win and are still only down by 1. Just don't know how the team'll hold up in the 2nd half once Clemson adjusts, this team doesn't got the blue chip prospects that Clemson does. But I don't know how much of this is necessarily an indictment on Clemson. With that being said their QB has looked very uninspiring so far and those DJU memories are probably still lingering among their fans.

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Is Clemson this bad??  Duke this good or something in the middle? 

I don’t think Duke is as bad as people think they are and I certainly think Clemson is overrated. Klubnik only played significant snaps in two games.

He beat up on a bad UNC defense and got beat up on by a good Tennessee team.

This situation could play out very similar to the way the DJ Uiagalelei situation played out. Uiagalelei looked good filling in for Trevor Lawrence but as teams started to get more film on him we found out that he wasn’t nearly as good as we thought he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...