Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I disagree it should be Duke's ball, but hate Clemson so I'm cool lol. Tigers fans must be losing their minds right now.

I mean it was over after those 3 straight drives to the goal and nothing.  Comedy show from that point forward.   Tiger fans already numb by the time that bogus call came

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I don’t know about that one.   Board would be going nuts if that call went the other way lol.  Not that Clemson could do anything but botch the drive in the end.

Kenny Pickett effect. 

 

When a player starts to slide or simulates a slide the ball is considered down at that spot. It's immediately done now because of that fake slide. I'm sure it will be changed after this game too. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

Kenny Pickett effect. 

 

When a player starts to slide or simulates a slide the ball is considered down at that spot. It's immediately done now because of that fake slide. I'm sure it will be changed after this game too. 

Yeah. It’s not the right call.  It might be because they fugged up the rule book after that play.    I’m sure they will change it then.  You can’t separate the hit from the play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, both instances of references to the defense were specific to the run defense.  I should have said "run defense" the 2nd time.  You admit there has been ample personal issue but then use those stats to support your argument. I'm not arguing on the effectiveness of his specific scheme overall.  I'm saying he is only now getting the proper personal to run his scheme.  The stats are the stats and while I don't disagree with any of what you're saying, 3 years of those stats are based on the Panthers front office not giving him the tools to run a competitive NFL defense until this year with D. Brown getting healthy and the additional of Tre'von Moehrig. I want to see his defense when we don't have multiple key starter positions manned with players who would IMHO are not starting level players.  With some talent  I say all this while not being a big fan of his scheme.  I would prefer a 4-3 but that's neither here or there. And yes, I would call getting requests and interviews from other teams who want to hire him good evidence that he may be a pretty good DC and has a lot of potential as a HC. In 2022 he had HC requests from the Broncos, Colts, and Texans.  He also had requests for DC from the Vikings, Falcons and the Panthers.  We hired him to be our DC. In 2023 it was the Falcons, Raiders and Seahawks for a HC position. In 2024 the Falcons, Seahawks and the Panthers interviewd him for HC.  We blocked the Jags from a DC interview. In 2025 (which is this years hiring cycle) so far its the Falcons, Raiders and just today the Steelers, all for the HC position.  
    • The Giants still may be crap but they just improved somewhat by hiring Harbaugh,  
×
×
  • Create New...