Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1: Panthers vs Falcons


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

You drafted him in the first and you are debating about starting him?  Not sure I follow here.

I have other backs ahead of him his projected points are still low currently it's only Friday. I could easily slide him into the W/R spot Sunday morning I'm waiting to hear confirmation about Burns. Fairly straightforward to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

I have other backs ahead of him his projected points are still low currently it's only Friday. I could easily slide him into the W/R spot Sunday morning I'm waiting to hear confirmation about Burns. Fairly straightforward to follow.

No way I am sitting my first round pick no matter who they play.  Who are your other options?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

It's a passing league. It is much easier to score through the air than on the ground. Stop the pass, then worry about the run 

I thought it's a matchup league you exploit your opponents weaknesses to max. I understand what you're saying but usually you beat your opponent by exploiting there weaknesses. Remember teams running for 200 plus last season on us in this passing league but rarely passing for 350 or something crazy like that because we couldn't stop the run but have done well against good passing offenses.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

I thought it's a matchup league you exploit your opponents weaknesses to max. I understand what you're saying but usually you beat your opponent by exploiting there weaknesses. Remember teams running for 200 plus last season on us in this passing league but rarely passing for 350 or something crazy like that because we couldn't stop the run but have done well against good passing offenses.

 

 

 

We were 8th in the league in yards per rush. So our run D wasn't as bad as folks make it out to be. You can rush all you want. If you don't have a QB, it makes it much tougher to score.

 

Edit to add; Also, the thing about rushing teams. It takes much longer to put a drive together, which makes every mistake that much more important and more difficult to overcome. 

 

If you have a hold on 1st down, now it's 2nd and 20. Chances of getting that first down running the ball are far less than passing for it. 

Edited by Gerry Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

We were 8th in the league in yards per rush. So our run D wasn't as bad as folks make it out to be. You can rush all you want. If you don't have a QB, it makes it much tougher to score.

 

Edit to add; Also, the thing about rushing teams. It takes much longer to put a drive together, which makes every mistake that much more important and more difficult to overcome. 

 

If you have a hold on 1st down, now it's 2nd and 20. Chances of getting that first down running the ball are far less than passing for it. 

The downside is also an upside. If you sustain long drives with success, then your opponent feels the pressure to make the most of their drives, since they get fewer drives. 
 

Is there anything worse than a ball control opponent keeping the ball all game? The best defensive strategy is often not allowing the opposing offense play at all lol. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

The downside is also an upside. If you sustain long drives with success, then your opponent feels the pressure to make the most of their drives, since they get fewer drives. 
 

Is there anything worse than a ball control opponent keeping the ball all game? The best defensive strategy is often not allowing the opposing offense play at all lol. 

 

Sure long ball controlled drives are disheartening. But they are a bittch to sustain because every mistake can be a drive killer. Not many teams can run it up and down the field and never make mistakes. Running the ball is fine. But it's passing the ball where the points are at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been a wait and see optimist with Bryce….but this worries me a lot. You have to be able to command a team as a QB. It’s one of the most underrated qualities of the position. How many quiet qbs like that have you seen really be successful or lead a team to long term success? Cam has already mentioned this about Bryce and it does not seem like things have changed much since last season on him being more vocal. 
    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
×
×
  • Create New...