Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Soooo Bryce Young will never QB sneak???


Basbear
 Share

Recommended Posts

The most unstoppable play on 4th and 1(or less) and it's not in the play book?

I cannot find the source, but I saw it was in one of the panthers.com fluff pieces. Defenses dont have to even game plan(even the fake snap/draw them off-sides is null) against this when playing the panthers. The rules crew is reviewing the play call in the off-season cause it has like a 94% success ratio(ala extra point change). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Haven't seen that anywhere but outside of a massive quarterback like Cam Newton, sneaks are as much about your blockers as they are the quarterback.

Tom brady was the best or near tops and hes about least athletic as a QB could have been, plus I doubt he had a much better squat than young...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Unstoppable is probably not the best way to describe …. Especially since the bears failed to convert sneaks two weeks in a row with Fields.

Quote

How effective is the QB sneak in the National Football League (NFL)? According to Jason Kelce, the QB sneak has a 94% chance of gaining one yard. Other sources have the success rate at anywhere from 84% to 88%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I want to be part of the 93.84333% success rate for a first down. I didn't know it was illegal for young to do this...

maybe he can get in shotgun formation and run towards the LOS just before the hike......

QB sneak on 4th down is about as unstoppable as a 2TE formation and run up the middle on 4th down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I want to be part of the 93.84333% success rate for a first down. I didn't know it was illegal for young to do this...

maybe he can get in shotgun formation and run towards the LOS just before the hike......

All I asked was if you wanted Bryce QB sneaking I never said it was illegal for him lol. I’m sure he will QB sneak at some point but I’m not mad if he doesn’t.. not yet at least. Now if we consistently seem to not be able to get a yard or inches converted then I’m wanting him to run them. 
 

LOL at your second paragraph lolll 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

You only confirmed what I stated.

Still a high success rate that the panthers will not even try. 

Hate to add the rando mess of "complaining about werido _____ " panther fan. To me this a huge issue on any goal-line or inch deals when you cannot use a 94% win rate play....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asking Bryce to sneak is just asking for injuries.

Having said that, it could end up being quite an effective play for us to pull out of our bag late in big games during his career.  If we almost never do it and teams don't think we'll run it with Bryce, having it in our back pocket for future playoff games would be nice.

But no, I never want to see him do it in random regular season games, not once.

It's also why I never understood us not going after someone like Jamal Williams with that being his super power to get those 1 yard dives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...