Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 : All-22 Review Requests


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

there is a chance I will be able to do the All22 this week. My wife just shared with me that tomorrow we will be on a train for four hours while crossing Italy. So I will have some down time. 
 

there are two things that need to happen for me to be able to pull this together:

 

1. nfl + releases the all 22 (24-48 hours after game is played)

2. The train has good Wi-Fi 

 

I will share that I am goin to be doing this on my laptop, so I will be unable to do video, but will be detailed in my screenshots.  
 

lastly, I will be keeping it high level and intentional tomorrow. So won’t be as heavy but should still serve value.

 

all that being said …. Let me know what you want to see. 
 

reminder : bulleted form helps for me to pull together 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halfway through the all 22… I know this isn’t what you all want to hear but it isn’t a play calling issue… it’s an execution issue. 
 

It’s pretty bad how some of our players look in frank/brown’s system. 
 

Ian Thomas, DJ chark (he gets a longer leash bc he was out), mays, Zavala (at LG), and TMJ… all had a handful of plays they just looked lost on Monday night.

 

i know frank isn’t the type to rip into his players, but some names need someone to lay into them for the mental mistakes 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our oline got absolutely man handled … the only players that appeared to be consistent and effective was Bozeman and moton. 
 

I get that pff has a rating system… but I don’t know how some of our players scored so well. Ickey was horrible in 3 straight series blocking for our run plays. We could have pre-injury Nick Chubb and still have the same stats.

 

im pretty frustrated at Mayes and Zavala .. neither knew how to get to the second level on their blocks… they just let Werner and David crash our lanes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

@TheCasillas here is probably a more positive look. How was the Grugier-Hill film?

He looked pretty good live.

Out of position on the Taysum Hill runs but swarmed the ball for sure. There were a couple of plays where he was eaten alive by a second level guard … however, there were some flashes that makes me feel good about his potential

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been a wait and see optimist with Bryce….but this worries me a lot. You have to be able to command a team as a QB. It’s one of the most underrated qualities of the position. How many quiet qbs like that have you seen really be successful or lead a team to long term success? Cam has already mentioned this about Bryce and it does not seem like things have changed much since last season on him being more vocal. 
    • Purpose This study investigates the interplay between strategic goals and calculative practices, specifically Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA). Drawing on practice-based theories, the research aims to understand how managers strategize with CPA, including the balancing of financial and strategic objectives and the interplay of institutionalized practices with individual practitioners’ actions. Design The study uses a qualitative, revelatory, and exploratory case study approach at the sub-organizational level in a manufacturing company. The researchers compare CPA practices across six departments, guided by a phenomenological research design. Data collection methods include informal conversations, qualitative observations, written documentation, numerical evidence from the accounting system, and interviews. Findings The study offers four novel findings to the field. First, it highlights how managers employ procedural and interactive strategizing to reframe CPA practices. The sophistication of CPA practices increases with unevenly distributed customer volume, high customer-specific, controllable overhead, customer-to-customer interaction, and service complexity. Conversely, the sophistication of cost-focused CPA practices tends to decrease with diverse strategic goals. Additionally, CPA become more effective through the utilization of non-financial information, employee empowerment, localization, and strategic alignment. Second, CPA can be adapted through integrative strategizing where managers avoid using it as a financial benchmark for strategic initiatives. Third, accountants actively seek intermediary roles to incorporate arguments from strategy and marketing to balance strategic objectives–contrary to their portrayal as myopic guardians of profitability. Fourth, the localization of CPA practices to front-line employees compensates for a lack of sophisticated CPA practices. Future research Future research should, investigate the adaptation of calculative practices in different cultures, and industries. Exploring additional contextual factors such as uncertainty, management characteristics, and linguistic framing of practices would be beneficial. Examining the interactions in utilizing CPA practices between front-line staff and customers would shed light on their effectiveness. Lastly, investigating the role of consultants in diffusing such practices would offer valuable perspectives.
×
×
  • Create New...