Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Passing Chart against NO


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

Both. Young looks like a washed Ryan and Frank is a dud all around. His days as a QB guru in Philly look like where he peaked in his career.

More of the same from Dalton is what I am expecting. I do expect a shot or 2 deep that Young couldn't or wouldn't take, even if his arm is limited at this point on his career. Young has completed what 1 pass over 20 yards? Like the guys said 'walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...'.

maybe the QB guru in Philly was Doug Pederson, the dude calling the plays and setting up the QB for success.  Same play caller who just took the worst team in the NFL.....to the playoffs in his first season after taking over.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

maybe the QB guru in Philly was Doug Pederson, the dude calling the plays and setting up the QB for success.  Same play caller who just took the worst team in the NFL.....to the playoffs in his first season after taking over.   

100%. Reich already proved he was a dud in Indy. The hype build up for him was not deserved in any way.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

100%. Reich already proved he was a dud in Indy. The hype build up for him was not deserved in any way.

as is normal in the Tepper window, Rhule should of never sniffed a year 3.  Just another mistake in the countless sea of them in the Tepper era.  Pederson would have been a great hire if you wanted to go the retread route. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

as is normal in the Tepper window, Rhule should of never sniffed a year 3.  Just another mistake in the countless sea of them in the Tepper era.  Pederson would have been a great hire if you wanted to go the retread route. 

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Newtcase said:

This dumb poo again.  Below is Ryan Leaf's first season.  Does it have anything to do with how Bryce will turn out?  NO and neither do these ridiculous comparisons to anyone else.

image.png.ed676d61abc076f523da35f7fbec7fe6.png

Hey look Ryan won a game or three.  BTW I think youre helping making my point.

 

The point is that after two games you dont, you cant know poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin or something like that.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Hey look Ryan won a game or three.  BTW I think youre helping making my point.

 

The point is that after two games you dont, you cant know poo.

Then just make your point, two games is indicative of nothing.  Stop propping a valid point up with a pointless comparison.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin type or something.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

Raid did the overcoming himself and a long HC stint stagnation. That was impressive and best case scenario. Reich never had that upside. I'm with you on retreds. There are some situations where a retred has traction situationally but this was just more flailing by Tepper.

I wanted one of the 2 OCs. The one with the Lions still looks like the best catch out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin type or something.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

I wanted McCarthy after Ron was let go and I still stand by that. We are going to be through 2 HCs before McCarthy is out of Dallas. 80% of retreads are that for a reason but 20% or so learn from mistakes or come out of a bad situation. (Belichick, Dungy, Pederson, Fox, Carroll, Reid) but most are garbage.

Edited by Cdparr7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

The tendency for knee jerk opposite reaction mistakes under Tepper is becoming an alarming trend. Teddy sucked. He was smart but physically limited. So we trade for Darnold who has all the physical tools you want but can't read a field. That ended predictably. Rhule sucked and he had virtually zero NFL experience with a staff that lacked NFL experience. We replace him with a retread.

It just feels like every mistake under Tepper leads to a reaction in the polar opposite direction. Well, that sucked so obviously the opposite extreme will yield guaranteed success, right?

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49ers offense looks good because Kittle, Samuel, and McCaffery can all get separation against man coverage. Purdy just has to deliver the ball. I haven't seen one Panther yet get any separation from a DB unless it was a crossing route to Theilen. He is too old to be our WR1. Scheme and Playmaking sucks here in Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...