Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Passing Chart against NO


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

Both. Young looks like a washed Ryan and Frank is a dud all around. His days as a QB guru in Philly look like where he peaked in his career.

More of the same from Dalton is what I am expecting. I do expect a shot or 2 deep that Young couldn't or wouldn't take, even if his arm is limited at this point on his career. Young has completed what 1 pass over 20 yards? Like the guys said 'walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...'.

maybe the QB guru in Philly was Doug Pederson, the dude calling the plays and setting up the QB for success.  Same play caller who just took the worst team in the NFL.....to the playoffs in his first season after taking over.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

maybe the QB guru in Philly was Doug Pederson, the dude calling the plays and setting up the QB for success.  Same play caller who just took the worst team in the NFL.....to the playoffs in his first season after taking over.   

100%. Reich already proved he was a dud in Indy. The hype build up for him was not deserved in any way.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

100%. Reich already proved he was a dud in Indy. The hype build up for him was not deserved in any way.

as is normal in the Tepper window, Rhule should of never sniffed a year 3.  Just another mistake in the countless sea of them in the Tepper era.  Pederson would have been a great hire if you wanted to go the retread route. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

as is normal in the Tepper window, Rhule should of never sniffed a year 3.  Just another mistake in the countless sea of them in the Tepper era.  Pederson would have been a great hire if you wanted to go the retread route. 

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Newtcase said:

This dumb poo again.  Below is Ryan Leaf's first season.  Does it have anything to do with how Bryce will turn out?  NO and neither do these ridiculous comparisons to anyone else.

image.png.ed676d61abc076f523da35f7fbec7fe6.png

Hey look Ryan won a game or three.  BTW I think youre helping making my point.

 

The point is that after two games you dont, you cant know poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin or something like that.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Hey look Ryan won a game or three.  BTW I think youre helping making my point.

 

The point is that after two games you dont, you cant know poo.

Then just make your point, two games is indicative of nothing.  Stop propping a valid point up with a pointless comparison.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin type or something.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

Raid did the overcoming himself and a long HC stint stagnation. That was impressive and best case scenario. Reich never had that upside. I'm with you on retreds. There are some situations where a retred has traction situationally but this was just more flailing by Tepper.

I wanted one of the 2 OCs. The one with the Lions still looks like the best catch out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, I'm must talking about in the world of retreads though.  Which isn't the path I generally would argue for.  Unless the Steelers happened to fire Mike Tomlin type or something.   Which would be a version of KC landing Andy Reid.  I can handle those retreads. 

I think in today's NFL.  You should try to go the route the Rams, Phins, 49ers etc went. Young offensive minds.   I like those gambles better than going after failed HCs.   Especially older ones. 

I wanted McCarthy after Ron was let go and I still stand by that. We are going to be through 2 HCs before McCarthy is out of Dallas. 80% of retreads are that for a reason but 20% or so learn from mistakes or come out of a bad situation. (Belichick, Dungy, Pederson, Fox, Carroll, Reid) but most are garbage.

Edited by Cdparr7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was always the most likely outcome given the Rhule debocle, a 180 to a washed up retred that sold him on a future that wouldn't be delivered again.

Pederson messed up big time in Philly at the end. Good for him turning that around but it wasn't a guaranteed turnaround when Jax hired him.

The tendency for knee jerk opposite reaction mistakes under Tepper is becoming an alarming trend. Teddy sucked. He was smart but physically limited. So we trade for Darnold who has all the physical tools you want but can't read a field. That ended predictably. Rhule sucked and he had virtually zero NFL experience with a staff that lacked NFL experience. We replace him with a retread.

It just feels like every mistake under Tepper leads to a reaction in the polar opposite direction. Well, that sucked so obviously the opposite extreme will yield guaranteed success, right?

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49ers offense looks good because Kittle, Samuel, and McCaffery can all get separation against man coverage. Purdy just has to deliver the ball. I haven't seen one Panther yet get any separation from a DB unless it was a crossing route to Theilen. He is too old to be our WR1. Scheme and Playmaking sucks here in Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...