Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football - Week 4


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Yeah, you could tell by Dabo’s reaction to that play it had a built in throw to audible to and Cade went there.  But I blame Dabo for putting any decision making on Cade.   He should of made it clear that was not something he could go to in that scenario regardless of what the coverage said.

Sometimes simplest is best.  Third and short and your Oline had been recently run blocking well, just sneak it twice.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Holy poo, Clemson are washed.

#4 team beat them in OT…and FSU was out gained by 100+ yards on the day, lost time of possession, etc.  

Clemson isn’t washed.  It just young talent.  Young talent that isn’t being coached and managed well in games up against older, experienced portal driven teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

#4 team beat them in OT…and FSU was out gained by 100+ yards on the day, lost time of possession, etc.  

Clemson isn’t washed.  It just young talent.  Young talent that isn’t being coached and managed well in games up against older, experienced portal driven teams. 

Where's the explosive talent on O?

That #4 ranking for FSU is a mirage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Where's the explosive talent on O?

That #4 ranking for FSU is a mirage. 

It’s just young.  And injuries have been an issue at the position the last couple years.    Which hurts a program that is focused on development and not the portal.


And I don’t disagree about the #4 ranking.  They aren’t a top 5 team. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...