Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Tarik look ready?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yeah we are only allowed to call Burns overpaid. The Huddle way.

Burns isn't overpaid yet.  $30 million plus might be overpayment.  My only thing is we have too many holes to dedicate that much money to a pass rusher.  Extend Brown (equally as important) for much less money and trade Burns for some assets 1st round plus is ideal IMO.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Burns isn't overpaid yet.  $30 million plus might be overpayment.  My only thing is we have too many holes to dedicate that much money to a pass rusher.  Extend Brown (equally as important) for much less money and trade Burns for some assets 1st round plus is ideal IMO.  

I have come around to trading Burns. 

 

But I honestly wouldn't trust Fitt with that 1st round pick. I rather trade for a established player and get a 2nd or 3rd round pick with said player.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

7th largest cap hit next year amongst all RBs.  When you talk about a bad contract, it generally isn’t structured to show up in the first year. 

Maybe it’s better to wait until next year to see if it’s still 7th… I’d be willing to bet it’s not even top 10.  It’s just not how the nfl salary cap works.

 

also, going year by year and choosing when it is its highest.. is not the best way to evaluate a contract total cost. You want to do TCV over MS .. not YOY cap hit 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...