Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football - Week 5


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

It gets worse for Sanders and his boys this week.

USC's defense will keep Colorado in it. 

Their defense allowed 28 points to a left for dead Arizona State team. ASU only lost by 14. 

Riley's teams are lazy and have no spark vs opponents their anticipated to destroy/beat. I expect this game to be close because of Riley's ineptitude to motivate his players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Tailgating in Durham? Is this a joke? 

LOLZ. I'm not a Duke fan, but thinking UNC has better tailgating when the majority have to tailgate in fugingg parking garages is stupid.

Also, the tailgating on Dukes campus is 1. Free. 2. Easy to access. 3. A laid back and chill atmosphere. 

Lastly, Durham is 5X better than Chapel Hill now. Chapel Hill tore down and closed half the businesses that made Chapel Hill what it was. Linda's and TOPO (even though their food sucks) are the only two places worth a damn to venture to in Chapel Hill now. 

They're literally replacing Spanky's with a fuging fast food chain for fugs sake. 

Edited by OUCPFL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...