Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chuba... SMDH


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

No idea why that ball didn’t instantly go to Chark. This isn’t the first time it looks like Bryce is second guessing himself in the pocket 

he isnt the first read from what I am gathering. The first read is TMJ then Thomas and most likely back to Chark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm not saying its ideal, but its there.

Screenshot 2023-10-01 at 9.17.21 PM.png

It's not the first read is the problem. The play is designed to go TMJ>THOMAS>THIELEN/CHARK

 

It's a flood concept to pull the zone away from the middle of the field. Thomas and Chark are running the man beaters. If Chuba is able to stay on the strong side and block Smith.. that ball is either going back of the endzone to Thielen or middle to Chark

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

It's not the first read is the problem. The play is designed to go TMJ>THOMAS>THIELEN/CHARK

 

It's a flood concept to pull the zone away from the middle of the field. Thomas and Chark are running the man beaters. If Chuba is able to stay on the strong side and block Smith.. that ball is either going back of the endzone to Thielen or middle to Chark

I retract my last post… explains a lot.. I’m becoming more intrigued of what BY might be able to accomplish with proper blocking… not holding my breath tho.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

So Ian wasn't supposed to chip the end?  I was screaming at Thomas on that play.  How can you have pass rusher lined up across from you and allow him to get a free release?

Only if the end goes upfield... but the end crashed because they had an outside blitz coming Smith

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...