Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMAC

Frank9999

By Frank9999,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Frank9999 Proficient

Frank9999

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

The only way the trade made any sense was strictly dependent on our success with utilization of the picks provided. Thus far is looks like we dropped the ball on all of them. 

Right, it just keeps looking more and more like Fitterer is an amateur GM. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank9999 Proficient

Frank9999

Posted
  • Author
Posted

When the trade happened I figured it was prob good since we didnt seem close to competing but then Fitterer starting feeding us the oh we just needed to drop the qb in stuff. Then it started to become more questionable. Also now we seem desperate for playmakers and kind wasted some of those pics on questionable players ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Wow I can’t believe this has never been discussed here before I really thought this board would have gone into excruciating detail into this topic before but wow good on you for bringing this topic to our attention thank you truly from the bottom of my heart 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

Hurney gave CMC a bad contract and Rhule couldn't use him and to make it worse was running him into the ground trying to hide his problems behind CMC. It stinks but the causality of proplems come in from every direction. Fritterer just got very little in return.

Trading Moore sure does look incredibly stupid tho. No way to downplay that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Veteran

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

The only way the trade made any sense was strictly dependent on our success with utilization of the picks provided. Thus far is looks like we dropped the ball on all of them. 

The fact that we got rid of CMC for DJ Johnson and the worst pick we threw in on the Young deal is pretty depressing.

The draft has been a big bag of poo the past few years with Fitt. We’ve traded away our best players and done very little with that value and then traded away a bunch of picks and gotten very little. Poor Matt Rhule never had a chance with the trades and picks we made, lol!

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Veteran

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Hurney gave CMC a bad contract and Rhule couldn't use him and to make it worse was running him into the ground trying to hide his problems behind CMC. It stinks but the causality of proplems come in from every direction. Fritterer just got very little in return.

Trading Moore sure does look incredibly stupid tho. No way to downplay that one.

Fitterer got 4 picks in return and traded CMC to SF. I believe we had an offer from the Rams too and a smart GM would have likely realized that CMC in SF was going to help turn SF around and that Stafford started off 2022 hurt and the Rams would likely get worse. Instead our SF picks got worse and worse and the Rams second got better and better.

The problem was still that we didn’t evaluate well and make good pics.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Bryce isn't a risk-taking gunslinger.  That's just QB DNA.  No one has ever said that is what we were drafting when we went that route.  That's my point.  That's not Bryce. Can you make Alex Smith throw deep? Sure.  He will occasionally.  In the reverse, can you ask Brett Favre to just take the easy layups? Sure.  He can in moments.  But in the end, they are what they are.  as I have said, Canales probably could win more games with PJ Walker.  And Bryce is a better overall QB than PJ.  PJ Walker would also have much worse games mixed in that Bryce would.   
    • CPF4LIFE
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
×
×
  • Create New...