Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who from the Huddle would get the franchise tag?


pstall

Recommended Posts

Think it through. Don't just shoot from the hip and go all Jules on me. The Huddle has a long standing tradition of top notch posters who have a great football acumen. Sure there are those that either are cut and pasters or wouldn't know the difference between a 3-4 or Nickel package if you injected them with John Facienda's DNA. Which kept next to Teddy ballgame's in Lexington Mass.

Only the best get franchised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me... because I give you all the scoops...

Plus, I'll stay here for pretty cheap... even less than other boards would offer me...

You do offer quality stuff. I got super duper inside source(s) as well but I only use to settle bar bets and keep Duke Energy at bay...:biggrin5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's an uncapped year we get three right?

Mr. Scot--The voice of reason

Sultan33g--Duh Ass pics!

Jangler--Just look at the man's signature.

I can't pick Zod because he is basically our J. Richardson.

There are some very close runnerups to these however so don't feel bad I didn't pick you Fiz, Raging Bull, SLJ, et al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...